Oh Dianna, that is awful! I can't believe it either, though I had a somewhat similar situation with my MIL.
Her doc prescribed Prempro when she was around 70. She was long past menopause, of course, so I asked her why he prescribed it. To prevent bone loss/osteoporosis, she said. To me, that was patently ridiculous as she was heavy, ate plenty of dairy products, and got plenty of exercise, so I didn't think she was in a very high risk category for osteo. Perhaps she'd had a bone scan she didn't tell me about that indicated the need, but I think there were certainly better meds for that, even back then (this would have been in the 2000-2002 time frame). I told her that I thought it was wrong that she was on hormones, but of course she was raised to 100% trust MDs. A couple of years later, she developed uterine cancer. Thankfully, it had not spread, so she had a hysterectomy but no chemo or radiation was recommended. She was incredibly scared to tell me that she was diagnosed with cancer b/c she knew I had been against the Prempro, and apparently that is what the onco thought caused it. He took her off it, of course, and over 10 years later she's had no cancer recurrences, thankfully. She has also never been diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis and is not on any meds to prevent that either, so I honestly don't know why the original doc prescribed the Prempro.
Just shows we all have to be our own health advocates, educate ourselves, and not be afraid to question MDs!