Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235

    Question Advice on Buying a Computer

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Hi everyone,

    I'm trying to pick a cycling computer and was hoping to get some input from any of you who have them. I'm looking at the following models:

    * CatEye Double Wireless Speed/Heart Rate (CC-HR200DW)
    http://www.cateye.com/en/products/vi...d=6&subCatId=0

    * Cateye Double Wireless Speed/Cadence (CC-CD300DW)
    http://www.cateye.com/en/products/vi...d=6&subCatId=0

    * Cat Eye TR-100 - discontinued???
    - (I couldn't find the link this one on Cat Eye's website)
    - has both heart rate and cadence but is not wireless
    - allows you to upload data to your PC


    I'd like to have both cadence and heart rate, but I'm having a hard time finding the TR-100 which offers both features.

    I've considered getting the DW cadence model (and just getting a separate heart rate monitor), but I'm concerned about some complaints I read in bikerHen's thread ("Wireless Problems") regarding the accuracy of wireless cadence systems.

    Have any of you had *good* experiences with the wireless cadence model?
    Have any of you had problems with the accuracy of data on the heart rate double wireless model?

    Thanks in advance for your help,

    ~Cari

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,609
    I have this one: Cateye Double Wireless Speed/Cadence (CC-CD300DW)

    I love it. I really do. The only problem I had was completely an operator error, and unfortunately, it happened on a 7 day trip, so I was constantly asking, "Are we there yet? Are we there yet?" I didn't have the manual with me, and no one had a clue how to get it out of the secondary lap-counter mode. Now I know (hold the '2' button for two seconds, doh!)

    Other than that, I do like it. I get comments on the transmitter down on my chain stay, but it works, and it has been very reliable (have about 2,000 miles on it since May) and I think the lack of wires is very cool!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235

    Cadence vs. Heart Rate

    Anyone have an opinion on which feature is more useful: cadence or heart rate?

    Have any of you tried the double wireless heart rate model?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    3,099
    First Cari: Welcome to the board. There's a thread under the open titled "getting to know you" gives you a chance to meet us and if you feel so inclined tell us something about you!

    Re: your question, I actually don't have an HRM. I've been kicking around the idea of getting one but I don't intend on racing, I can Tell I'm losing body fat/weight and I KNOW when my heart is pouding! LOL

    Now Cadence: Love it!! I keep my computer set on the cadence and rarely look at anything else until the end of my ride. Using the cadence monitor has improved my pedalling by leaps and bounds while saving my knees, ankles and muscles. When I started monitoring cadence I was at about 76-86, the day I went over 90 I thought I was just too cool. Now I ride between 95-103 pretty much all the time and keep it around 80-85 when climbing. I firmly believe the reason I can ride a century 1 day and 25-50 miles the next is because of my cadence.
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, champagne in one hand, strawberries in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming: "Yeah Baby! What a Ride!"

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •