You will get many profound and experienced suggestions here. I'm just a newbie with a new Trek 7.6 FX and love it very much. It's incredibly lightweight for the price.
To disable ads, please log-in.
Hi everyone!
I stumbled across the forum today and have really enjoyed reading all of the helpful advice I've found so far. I hope you don't mind entertaining another "help a n00b buy a bike" thread...
I did a fair amount of biking around town when I was in college at the University of Wisconsin (in Madison, a nice, bike-friendly city). I was riding a cheap-ish sporting goods store mountain bike that I bought in 8th grade. Yikes. I doubt it was anywhere near the right fit for me, as anytime I rode the thing carrying any little bit of weight in a backpack or messenger bag I felt like I couldn't breathe.
I do have a history of some orthopedic problems (chronic yet unpredictable knee, back, and hip pain, and scoliosis, probably all stemming from having one leg that is significantly longer than the other), so I'm definitely looking for a GOOD fit this time.
Anyway, I just moved from Madison to Tucson, AZ (also lots of bike lanes--yay!) for grad school and sold my old bike to a friend before I left.
I'd love to get into road bikes but don't feel quite confident enough in my riding skills to do the super-skinny tires and drop bars yet. Cyclocross is budgetarily WAY out of the question. I don't really see a need to have a mountain bike again, since my riding will probably be exclusively on paths and paved city streets.
So that leaves hybrids, eh? I visited a couple local bike shops yesterday and rode a few. I was very taken with the Bianchi Cortina, but my boyfriend has had no small share of problems with a kind of bottom-of-the-line Marin hybrid that he got a couple years ago... different brand and all that, but his negative experience buying from the "cheap" end of the spectrum of a "good brand" gives me pause. The bike shop guy also suggested the KHS Urban-X, but didn't have one in stock.
I'm drawn to the Trek WSD models, especially since I have small hands and am more on the leggy/short torso side. The 7.2 FX caught my eye online (I definitely prefer the look of a straight top tube to the staggered tube or curvy business), but I haven't had a chance to make it to any Trek stores yet to ride any. That one's also more expensive than the two I mentioned before.
I guess what's scariest to me is I know NOTHING about components. I know Bianchi is a respected name in bicycling, but for all I know the derailleurs on the Cortina could be made of tin foil and chewing gum.
Are there any good resources online anyone can suggest for educating myself on bicycle components? Can anyone help me out and tell me how things compare on the Bianchi, KHS, and Trek models I've linked above? Would anyone care to suggest another bike in the $500-or-less ballpark? Is anyone still reading this really long post?
Many thanks! I look forward to any and all opinions, and to reading lots of posts on this awesome forum for a long time to come!
You will get many profound and experienced suggestions here. I'm just a newbie with a new Trek 7.6 FX and love it very much. It's incredibly lightweight for the price.
I always trot out the Kona Dew and all the variations in the Dew line. Excellent hybrid, bombproof frame (as my LBS calls it) and the bottom of the line has decent components that can easily be upgraded later. http://www.konaworld.com/09_dew_u.cfm I rode mine on some long rides, commutes, and in a triathlon.
For your LLD, consider some custom cranks. A couple folks here on TE have cranks made by this guy: http://www.hscycle.com/Pages/cantsandwedges.html
"If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson
I've had two 7.2fx and they were terrific bikes. The tires would do well on road and gravel and it was an easy bike to ride. They call it a fitness bike instead of a hybrid because it doesn't have suspension and is more on the road bike side only with straight bars. I gave my last one up to help finance my Surly which does all my Trek did and more. As an entry level bike, I think it's a terrific choice. Just a piece of advice, if you aren't going mountain biking, don't get the front suspension if you look at other bikes. It just adds weight and you don't need it.
Have fun and welcome!
Claudia
2009 Trek 7.6fx
2013 Jamis Satellite
2014 Terry Burlington
I'm glad to hear you love your Trek. And there certainly seems to be no shortage of friendly and helpful people around here!
I hadn't heard of Kona before... I'll definitely take a look, thanks for the suggestion, and the link to the cranks! I normally wear a lifted shoe, but if I start getting into longer-distance riding, I would definitely consider getting some custom cranks.Originally Posted by KnottedYet
Hey! Yet another opportunity to show off and recommend my favorite bike
![]()
2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager
@ uforgot and Zen:
Glad to hear more positive feedback about Trek. I think I have a soft spot for them because they're a Wisconsin company. Though, Zen, I can't exactly tell what model you have from the pic... looks like a beauty, though.
EDIT: I posted a reply earlier to Pardes and KnottedYet, but it said it had to be approved by a mod and hasn't shown up yet... but this one posted right away...?
Last edited by badgercat; 08-10-2008 at 05:06 PM.
I have an older Trek 7100 fx (more similar to current 7.2fx) and I love it. I use it for commuting (30 km/day), it has a rack and fenders, but I've changed the tires for narrow slicks (very similar to my road bike) because I have no need for wider ones. I love that the wheels are 700. The componentry on that bike is much better than many bikes of similar price.
That's a 2007 FX7.2
2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager
Ah, this year's is a very different color (light blue) which is probably why I didn't recognize it. I think I like yours better. :P
My goodness, so much praise for Trek! I think I'll have to make a visit to my local Trek dealer tomorrow and check this stuff out for myself.
Thanks for all the opinions so far, everyone!
Yes, this year's model is the same color as my road bike.
A good color for a road bike but it didn't do anything for me on the FX.
Then the LBS had their spring clearance sale.
This bike had been hiding out in a box in the back room.
when I saw it out on the floor it spoke to me.
It said
"psst! Hey baby, over here!
Look at me, all sleek and black with a little hot pink thrown in for sex appeal...
I can take you places you've never been before.
Come on, you know you want me"
She was right and we're very happy together![]()
2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager
If you look at the Geometry of the Trek 7.2s for 2008, you will find that the WSD and the men's are the same. When I purchased mine in Oct. I pointed it out to the salesperson. He was pretty surprised. The 7.3s and up do have a difference, it was just the 7.2. I had a 7.2fx wsd like Zen's which I sold, and regretted (black with pink writing, very pretty) and in Oct. I purchased the men's 7.2fx which rides exactly like the wsd one did! It was in a mocha duotone which I loved. I didn't care for the women's baby blue. It's on the trek website. It's a brown.
Try riding both kinds and see what you think.
Claudia
2009 Trek 7.6fx
2013 Jamis Satellite
2014 Terry Burlington
Another vote for Trek. I have the same style/year as Zen but non-WSD
I agree- Trek and Kona both make excellent hybrids that are well thought out, better made than most Walmart-type bikes, yet still pretty affordable.![]()
Lisa
My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
My personal blog:My blog
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^