If it feels different to you, and you like the feel, go for it!
In the long run of delicious bike love, $75 isn't much.
To disable ads, please log-in.
I finally made it out today to a LBS that had both Treks and Orbeas. A very helpful salesperson got a gorgeous Orbea Onix Dama adjusted for me, and off I went on a test ride. I felt scarily stretched out and a little unstable in the front end. I wasn't too sure if this was just me being new to road bikes, but definitely knew I had felt more comfortable on other bikes. I had a sad moment as I said goodbye to the pretty Orbea
When I brought it back in, she commented that it did fit me, but it was on the larger side for me and the Trek would probably be better since it came in a smaller size. They didn't have any Treks in my size. So I went back to the Trek LBS I had been to before and rode a Madone 4.5 WSD and a Madone 5.1 WSD. The Madone WSD geometry is SOOO much more comfortable for me. I feel stable and safe. The 5.1 was definitely lighter but I can't justify the difference in price. I'm going to go with the 4.5 WSD.
However, I LOVED the Ultegra that was on the Onix and the 5.1. It just seemed to shift so much smoother. The brakes on the 5.1 were also more responsive but LBS man says he can probably emulate that feel by changing the brake pads.
The first LBS said that since the rear derailleur is already Ultegra in the 4.5, I could upgrade the shifters to emulate much of the feel of the Onix. She didn't think the difference in the crank/cassette was what I was appreciating. This upgrade would cost $75.
So finally to my question...do you think it is worth $75 to upgrade just the shifters to Ultegra? The second LBS didn't think it would make a huge difference (but he's willing to do it), but LBS #1 thought it would.
Thank you!
If it feels different to you, and you like the feel, go for it!
In the long run of delicious bike love, $75 isn't much.
"If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson
Yes! Shifters make such a huge difference in the long run. Ease of shifting and comfort over the miles will be energy saved and less pain. $75 is peanuts for upgrading shifters.
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
I'd like to be able to upgrade AWAY from my down tube shifters.
MadScot - how 'bout moving to bar-end shifters ($25 for bar-end adaptors) or turning your shifters into thumbies like Rivendell sells kits for?
http://www.rivbike.com/search/run?qu...&commit=Search
Last edited by KnottedYet; 03-24-2008 at 08:19 PM.
"If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson
Excuse the hijack but...Mad, I had no idea you had downtube shifters! maybe you should treat yourself to that new bike![]()
2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager
And if shifting is easier/smoother, you'll be more likely to shift when you should rather than avoiding it until you've waited too long. I've had this experience when I upgraded from downtube shifters to barends on my touring bike and then to Campy integrated brake levers-shifters on my road bike. Now that shifting is so easy, I do it before I have to--much easier on my poor knees!
Bad JuJu: Team TE Bianchista
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress." -Roth
Read my blog: Works in Progress
Do shifters really make a bigger difference than derailleurs? I thought it was the other way around. Why do the levers make so much difference? (I'm asking this sincerely -- I really didn't know).
However, switching out to Ultegra shifters for $75 seems like a good deal. You might ask what they would charge to swap out the front derailleur too -- they're not a terribly expensive part to begin with (at least compared to shifters), so it might be worth an extra $35 if you could do it that cheaply...
ETA: FWIW, I have read that Ultegra brakes *are* considerably stronger than 105s. I have never used 105 calipers -- my 105 bike has cantis, so I have no personal opinion on this -- but given your impression, it might be worth googling for some reviews.
Also important to remember that how well the bikes are tuned makes a big difference in how well they shift -- I can remember test-riding an Ultegra bike that had buttery shifting, followed immediately by a Dura-Ace bike that had OK, slightly rattley, slower shifting... Sometime the bikes on the floor aren't kept perfectly tuned (and sometimes the mechanics who put them together do a sloppier job than one would hope the first time).
Last edited by VeloVT; 03-25-2008 at 09:49 AM.
I agree. 105 brakes SUCK. (that's what I have and there are a couple of roads where I have to stop on a pretty significant downhill. major suck every time). DA brakes are supposedly awesome, but for the money, you can't beat Ultegra for value and performance. When I was bike shopping, I wound up with an Ultegra/105/FSA mix of components. Between the Ultegra and 105, the Ultegra is much much better. I will eventually upgrade the rest of my 105 stuff, especially the front derailleur which pisses me off to no end. There was a huge jump not just in components but in frame material between my bike and the next one up. I believe the same is true for the Trek. So, you will be getting a lot more with the 5.1. Now 105 levers can be a little "sticky" feeling, and I have to lube them up periodically. I think if you're considering upgrading immediately that you might want to reconsider the 5.1. If you want to postpone upgrading and you really want to stick with the 4.5 price point, then the 4.5 is good enough.
Different levels of shifters can have different mechanical design. The throw to shift can be shorter/longer and pressure needed can be lighter/heavier. The shape of the hood can be vastly different.
I have heard that DA shifters require a very light touch to shift compared to Ultegra and I have seen that the DA hoods are narrower. Both of these being great for small hands. I don't know how Ultegra compares to 105.
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
I moved from Ultegra to Dura Ace. Ooooh, my. Love the DA! Such a nice, light snap.
I think upgrading shifters from 105 to Ultegra would be a good thing....and definitely cheaper to do it now than to upgrade at a later time. If you can swing the additional cost (or can haggle them down a smidge), than I'd say do it.
Hijack on:
And...MadScot: Check out: http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/m...615089423.html
It's in Fredneck....maybe Zen can scope it out for you....if it's still available.
Hijack off.
2007 Seven ID8 - Bontrager InForm
2003 Klein Palomino - Terry Firefly (?)
2010 Seven Cafe Racer - Bontrager InForm
2008 Cervelo P2C - Adamo Prologue Saddle
Oops--terminology error--I was mainly talking about shifter location as far as making a difference in how often I'm willing to shift. OTOH, I DO find my Campy Veloce shifters easier to handle than many of the Shimano shifters I've tried-not sure which grade they were, though.
Bad JuJu: Team TE Bianchista
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress." -Roth
Read my blog: Works in Progress
Location of the shifters usually has to do with comfort and reach. You need to find what is optimum for you and beware that some bars "meld" better with some shifters.
Until the new Dura Ace came out, general consensus was that Campy required less pressure to shift. I can't remember though, does the new DA have as many trim points as Campy?
WAY bad bar and shifter positions*
http://www.terrybicycles.com/cycling...fastwoman.html
OK bar and shifter positions
http://www.terrybicycles.com/cycling_savvy/isispro.html
Mo' bettah bar and shifter positions
http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCBkM...?sid=07Roubaix
Generally, you want the top of the bar to be level from the side and the hood to seamlessly meld into it. You don't want the divot that your hands slide into because it puts pressure on the wrong places.
With each bar/shifter combo you sort of have to experiment to find this place and look for the optimum reach at the same time. I also set up my shifters to point inward a hair as it is more comfortable for my wrists.
*Both hubby and I saw this in the new Terry catalog and were rather horrified. What was Georgena thinking?
Last edited by SadieKate; 03-25-2008 at 12:14 PM.
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
SK - I don't know if this is true as I'd never be able to ride this way due to my super short legs...but a couple of the guys I used to work with had shifter locations similar to the ones on that Fast Woman you posted. I asked how that could be even remotely comfortable and they insisted that it was... When I next saw them riding, I knew why. They had their seat significantly higher than their bars. This meant that their bodies and arms were already somewhat angled downward over the bars and level bars and shifters would have cocked their wrists up. They had to have them tilted that way to be comfortable. Maybe Georgina displays the Fast Woman that way as their 'race' bike? I agree that it looks totally awful, but I also ride with my saddle and bars almost level like 90% of the people I know!
Oh, and I agree that Ultegra shifters are worth $75 and while you are at it, I'd also ask about an Ultegra front deraileur. I switched from 105 to Ultegra with my last bike and it felt worlds better. Personally, I'll definitely stick with Ultegra going forward (for the zippy road bike).
My new non-farm blog: Finding Freedom
Yeah, if you look at a lot of the pro-racer boys they're riding very small bikes for their size which does mean exactly what you say -- their torsos are much farther forward over their bars than the average rider. Of course, they also spend the entire race on the hoods and have the core strength to do that.
And these guys are about, what, less than 0.5% of the population?
And you also notice that it is the rare race that goes over 5 hours in the saddle.
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.