Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    373

    Polar CS200cad or CS400: Anyone use them

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Am in the market for a new bike computer for my roadbike with cadence function and I like the idea of having my heart rate displayed on it as well. My current HRM unit is quite big on my wrist and annoys me after an hour or so on the bike and often hurts my wrist after lon MTB rides. It looks like a choice between these two models but am struggling to find reviews on the CS400 in particular as its quite new. The CS400 has an altimeter built in which may be useful on my offroad rides.

    The CS400 is also twice the price of the CS200 and I'd have to buy a separate cadence unit (as well as two speed kits for my MTBs regardless of model). I think what I'm asking is: how good are they and is the CS400 worth twice the CS200 ?

    I've also ordered a RS200sd today with footpod for running - my poor bank account!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    sunny scottsdale, az
    Posts
    638
    i have the cs200cad and find it very convenient. its all wireless, one sensor for both speed and cadence. attaches to the chainstay (so you can see your mph on a trainer unlike older model cycle computers). you can choose what to display. i dont like seeing the odometer, so when i'm riding mine shows speed, avg speed, HR, cadence and current time. when youre done it'll page thru and show you your elapsed time/distance/HR/cadence yadayadayada. you can also directly download from the cycle computer to the polar web site (kind of like a bikejournal). all in all i like it.
    laurie

    Brand New Orbea Diva | Pink | Specialized Ruby
    2005 Trek Madone Road | Pink | Ruby
    1998 Trek 5200 Road | Blue | Specialized Jett
    ???? Litespeed Catalyst Road | Silver | Terry Firefly

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Florida panhandle
    Posts
    1,498
    I use the CS200 without cadence, and I like it fine. The display is clear and easy to read, the information is uploadable, and it gives me all the info I want. I'm not wild about the way it's mounted to the handlebar. I had a way cheaper unit that had a much better mounting system, but that one isn't made any longer (Supergo). The setup is a little complex, but if you go to the Polar online site, you'll find some online videos that walk you through setting up and using the thing.
    Bad JuJu: Team TE Bianchista
    "The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress." -Roth
    Read my blog: Works in Progress

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    373
    I've decided to go with the 200 as I'll be using it on my MTB as well. I was discussing it with one of my riding buddies last night and he reminded me of a recent crash where I flew over the bars into a foot deep stream and left the bike there. I'd be gutted if I'd paid a silly amount of money for a computer then dunked it in a stream!

    Its got all I really need and I'm looking forward to working on my cadence when commuting to work as it'll give me something to think about rather than wishing I was wearing an Ipod.

    I'll be mounting mine to the stem as I prefer that, I think it protects the computer a bit more on the MTB in the event of a crash and as I use the roadie for commuting I have a light and a small backup light on the bars until mid-spring so there is no room for anything else!
    Last edited by tattiefritter; 03-22-2007 at 07:34 AM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •