Hi kelownagirl,
The biomechanics on a recumbent are different. The muscle recruitment patterns are definitely different. It's been a while since I've thought about it and I haven't used one in years so my personal memory is a little foggy.
Things I know for sure:
- You work your glutes and hams in a different part of the range of motion through the pedal stroke that on a reg bike
- It's generally easier on your back
Things that seem right but I'm only about 90% sure:
- You bias the quads more and hams and glutes less
- You have to use more resistence to get the same HR changes, this has to do with muscle recruitment
What does that mean functionally:
You won't get the same neuromuscular training on the recumbent but if you have cycling experience, that's not a big deal, it's come back in 1 to 2 rides on the reg bike. If you're a newbie it'll take a little longer because the cadence and movement pattern hardwiring in your nervous system was not completely there to begin with.
You'll work your quads more and glutes and hams may suffer a bit, but it's better than doing nothing and if you combine it with some resistance training in functional movement patterns, (walking lunges, squats, one legged squats without weights), with light weight and high reps - 3 to 5 sets of 30 - you won't likely lose anything at all.
So it's way better than doing nothing, but it's not the same. Get a new trainer or get one fixed. BTW, the same issues are true for most of the standard upright stationary bikes at a gym but to a lesser degree.
Happy winter training. A friend of mine in Vernon says you've got tons of snow. Maybe you should cross country ski instead?



Reply With Quote
