Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532

    Sugar Knickers vs. Ergo Sensor Knickers

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I'm trying to choose between these. Anybody familiar with both or either?

    The XL on the Sugar Knickers looks like it will fit me. It appears it will take the XXL in the Ergos.

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    747
    I have the Sugar Knickers, and for some reason they feel like they run a little smaller than the Sugar Short. I'm about an 8 or a 10 in women's sizes and I take a medium. The Sugar Knickers are very comfortable but if you don't like low-rise stuff you won't like them -- they have a big dip in front and are fairly low-rise all around.

    They are also fairly lightweight -- not really for very cold weather, but perfect for fall.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532
    Thanks -- I'm a little hesitant about the low-rise. I may try the Ergo first.

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532
    Unless I try the Terrys.

    Sigh.

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    south west of Western Australia
    Posts
    60
    Hi pooks... I just got a pair of the Terry knickers, they are great. Very comfy, nice fabric for feel and temperature control, good sizing, got the flex chamois which I like. 10/10

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235

    I'd say Ergo Sensors

    Hey Pooks,

    I've tried both.

    Sugar Knicker
    Pros: Comfy, nice chamois, comfortable opening at leg
    Cons: Extremely low rise, thin fabric (this is a pro for me, but might be a con for you if you want them for cool weather.)

    Ergo Sensor Knickers
    Pros: Thick, durable fabric, would probably keep you warmer than the Sugars. Pretty and slimming blue contrast stitching.
    Cons: The chamois is nice but might not be appropriate for long rides. Blue contrast stitching might limit you in terms of matching colors.

    Have you considered Shebeest Pedal Pushers? I'm a big fan. And of course I've heard wonderful things here about the Etxe Ondo knickers, but I'm waiting for the warmer weather styles to come in.

    Happy shopping,

    Cari

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    I have the Shebeest knickers and the LouisGarneau Ergo Sensor knickers. They are both REALLY nice. Both have nice chamois and are well made. Yes, the Ergo has good weight fabric. Shebeest is a bit snugger in fit than the Ergo. Love the Shebeest too, though, and neither knicker has "diaper butt" effect.
    I love the blue line on the Ergo- very sleek.
    I have them both in Medium- I'm 140 lbs 5'5", pearshaped. Both fit comfortably snugly, as I prefer. If I were 10 lbs heavier I'd probably want to get the Shebeest in a large. I could probably still fit in the medium Ergo though.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532
    I ended up with the Terry knickers and like them a lot. I'm not a huge fan of the "ultimate chamoise" as I'm more "aware" of it than my others, but that might be because it hasn't been laundered yet and hasn't softened. I don't dislike it, but I know it's there.

    Embarassing moment. I was at the hospital in my mil's room when my husband mentioned the temps were predicted to drop into the 40s. I said, "Oh that reminds me -- I want to get some knickers for when that happens." He looked startled and so did the nurse's aide/tech who was in there. I described them and kept talking and didn't think more about it until later when we were driving home and he said it sounded like instead of "knickers" I'd said the n-word.

    Yikes!

    I think I'll call them capris from now on.


    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Florida panhandle
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by pooks View Post
    Yikes!
    I think I'll call them capris from now on.
    Hey, Pooks, you could call them "knickerbockers," which is the original term.

    I got both the Sugar Knickers and the Shebeest Pedal Pushers, and ended up sending the Sugars back. I don't like the thinner fabric, though the chamois seemed pretty nice--as far as I could tell without actually riding in them. The Shebeests have that great flex chamois which is so comfy and un-diaper-butt-like, plus I love love love that magical material they use as grippers instead the rubbery stuff on most biking bottoms. My only complaint about the Shebeests is that they're a bit too long, but I'm short enough that I'm used to things being too long so have no problem with pushing them up a bit. The magical grippers make them stay wherever I put them.

    I like the new Terry knickers that have a flex chamois similar to the Shebeests, but not that nice gripper, and the new Terrys seem to have a slightly lower rise in front--not so nice.
    Bad JuJu: Team TE Bianchista
    "The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress." -Roth
    Read my blog: Works in Progress

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •