Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    If you compare calorie for calorie dried vs. fresh vs. dehydrated, there's obviously something else going on besides taking out the water weight, but I have a feeling it's one of the things I guessed at.

    Raw apricots have .008 mg Fe/kcal; sulfured dried apricots .011; sulfured dehydrated apricots .019. That's a lot of variation.

    Anybody have any idea how big a sample size the USDA uses to come up with those values?

    IAE, obviously food is NOT fungible, so there's no guarantee the apricots each of us eats have the same amount of iron as the ones the USDA sampled. Guidelines only ... not rigid values for counting ...
    Last edited by OakLeaf; 10-24-2011 at 07:33 AM.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by OakLeaf View Post
    If you compare calorie for calorie dried vs. fresh vs. dehydrated, there's obviously something else going on besides taking out the water weight, but I have a feeling it's one of the things I guessed at.

    Raw apricots have .008 mg Fe/kcal; sulfured dried apricots .011; sulfured dehydrated apricots .019. That's a lot of variation.

    Anybody have any idea how big a sample size the USDA uses to come up with those values?

    IAE, obviously food is NOT fungible, so there's no guarantee the apricots each of us eats have the same amount of iron as the ones the USDA sampled. Guidelines only ... not rigid values for counting ...
    Most of them seem to have three data points...
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlie View Post
    Most of them seem to have three data points...
    Huh?
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by OakLeaf View Post
    Huh?
    They seem to have only used three samples for most of them. I should turn off the science-speak sometimes...
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    I would've figured it out if I'd bothered to click through. Yikes. Three (or fewer) 100-g samples to publish these figures that people rely on??? I guess that gives you an idea how seriously they take nutrition.



    And a lot of the nutritional values they give are based on zero data points, estimated from "another form of the same food, or similar food." Including the figures for dehydrated apricots, except for vitamin C and the B-complex which are likely to be further degraded by the extra processing. Which still doesn't explain the variation in iron between dehydrated apricots and the other forms.


    It's worth noting that for dried apricots, they had three data points, a mean iron content per 100 g of 2.66 g and a standard deviation of 0.624.
    Last edited by OakLeaf; 10-25-2011 at 05:16 AM.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •