Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 29

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    105 is a mid-range Shimano component group. Ultegra's one step higher. (I'm a Shimano girl. SRAM makes no sense to me!)

    I'm okay with my Avail. It was what fit in my price range at the time, but I discovered after the fact that Giant's WSD geometry doesn't agree with me. I need a short top tube because I have long legs and a short torso. I also want to upgrade the wheels and components once they start wearing out (probably another year or two). She's still a good bike for what I paid ($750) because I had no idea that I'd get into it as much as I did. Don't let me discourage you from looking at Giant. Giant makes good bikes for how much they cost--the geometry just doesn't work for me (and because of my proportions, a lot of bikes don't work). I'm looking at a Ruby for my next bike (and also at a Cannondale if I can find one to test-ride.)

    Shannon, I've definitely felt rattled, but not horribly so on parts of the trail, and I'm riding aluminum, albeit with 25s rather than the 23s that came with your bike. (No, I haven't changed them yet.
    Last edited by Owlie; 09-15-2011 at 12:22 PM.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    778
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlie View Post
    Shannon, I've definitely felt rattled, but not horribly so on parts of the trail, and I'm riding aluminum, albeit with 25s rather than the 23s that came with your bike. (No, I haven't changed them yet.
    I'm riding 25s now.. Tho I do weight a tad more then you do (dang feather-weight you So I may feel those a little more-- dunno. North from Milford is the section I'm talking about. Out from Loveland, north is pretty good trail, but your up near YS now.
    Starbucks.. did someone say Starbucks?!?!
    http://www.cincylights.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks for the explanations!

    I have short legs and a long torso, so we are the exact opposite!

    I currently have a Cannondale Quik. I believe that would be a CX, correct? It is great for the riding I am doing, but I am thinking I might want a road bike, also, for when I want to ride long and on pavement. Just thinking......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    778
    By cross or CX, I ment Cyclocross, not a hybrid like your Quick.

    http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/road...ss/2011-superx
    http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/road...clocross-caadx

    It's got drop bars like a road bike, but a more aggressive (wider/knobby) tire, so able to go a little off road... Tho not single track like a true mountain bike.
    Starbucks.. did someone say Starbucks?!?!
    http://www.cincylights.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1
    I had a hard time braking with 105's due to my small hands and decided to go with the Ruby APEX. I absolutely love my Ruby and have no regrets.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    somewhere between the Red & Rio Grande
    Posts
    5,297
    In Texas we they love to use the chip seal pavement (it is cheaper) and I have felt rattled on all carbon too. I actually felt my old steel bike absorbed better but then again Cannondale (my current bike) is known to be some of the stiffest bikes in business and stiffness negates some plushness. I had an aluminum bike when I commuted, hated the feel and the ride felt extremely harsh. Overall unless I could get titanium or steel, I would go carbon.

    I think the Ruby is a slightly less aggressive set up than the Madone, you may find this more comfortable. At least this was true when I looked a few years back, I am not up to speed on the 2012 versions.
    Amanda

    2011 Specialized Epic Comp 29er | Specialized Phenom | "Marie Laveau"
    2007 Cannondale Synapse Carbon Road | Selle Italia Lady Gel Flow | "Miranda"


    You don't have to be great to get started, but you do have to get started to be great. -Lee J. Colan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks! All of these terms seem foreign to me!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Mkay View Post
    I had a hard time braking with 105's due to my small hands and decided to go with the Ruby APEX. I absolutely love my Ruby and have no regrets.
    Huh, I have small hands and short fingers, and haven't really had a lot of trouble with Shimano. I do need short-reach shift levers(a borrowed bike with regular 105 was not a pleasant experience!), and does Shimano make short-reach 105 or Ultegra? They tend to advertise short-reach brake levers on entry-level bikes, but not so much on the higher-end ones.

    Jackie, don't worry. None of us were born knowing this stuff. We all had to learn.
    Last edited by Owlie; 09-16-2011 at 05:01 AM.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Shirley, MA
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlie View Post
    Huh, I have small hands and short fingers, and haven't really had a lot of trouble with Shimano. I do need short-reach shift levers(a borrowed bike with regular 105 was not a pleasant experience!), and does Shimano make short-reach 105 or Ultegra? They tend to advertise short-reach brake levers on entry-level bikes, but not so much on the higher-end ones.

    Jackie, don't worry. None of us were born knowing this stuff. We all had to learn.
    When I mentioned my difficulties with the Shimano 105 brakes during the test ride of the Madone, my sales guy mentioned that the 105s are intended to be shim-able. So they put shims in to lower the engagement point.

    The SRAM apparently can be adjusted without shims, which Nate did before I rode the Dolce.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Owlie View Post
    Huh, I have small hands and short fingers, and haven't really had a lot of trouble with Shimano. I do need short-reach shift levers(a borrowed bike with regular 105 was not a pleasant experience!), and does Shimano make short-reach 105 or Ultegra? They tend to advertise short-reach brake levers on entry-level bikes, but not so much on the higher-end ones.

    Jackie, don't worry. None of us were born knowing this stuff. We all had to learn.
    I believe that the Shimano Tiagras and Soras shift like Campagnolos, with a separate thumb shifter. I don't remember how large the hoods are. However, 105s and above use the 2:1 shifting, which is an issue for small hands.

    And what do you mean shim-able? Does that shorten the reach?
    2011 Specialized Crux, aka (Toxic Honey)
    I'm faster in kilometers!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Roadtrip View Post
    By cross or CX, I ment Cyclocross, not a hybrid like your Quick.

    http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/road...ss/2011-superx
    http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/road...clocross-caadx

    It's got drop bars like a road bike, but a more aggressive (wider/knobby) tire, so able to go a little off road... Tho not single track like a true mountain bike.
    Actually, I took my cyclocross onto the single track last weekend. It's quite common at my park, apparently. There were bits and stretches that I could not pass, such as a very steep uphill with roots, but I believe most of the mountain bikers were also walking it. Course, I was going much slower than they were

    And from what I understand, if you have small hands, SRAM is better with less hood and you won't accidentally brake when you try to shift. Unfortunately, I let the local bike shop person talk me into 105s instead, grr!
    2011 Specialized Crux, aka (Toxic Honey)
    I'm faster in kilometers!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Shirley, MA
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by Caddy View Post
    And from what I understand, if you have small hands, SRAM is better with less hood and you won't accidentally brake when you try to shift. Unfortunately, I let the local bike shop person talk me into 105s instead, grr!
    The fact that the hoods were smaller was another feature that made me prefer the SRAM over Shimano. The Shimano hoods were uncomfortable large for my petite little mouse paws.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Roadtrip View Post
    I'm riding 25s now.. Tho I do weight a tad more then you do (dang feather-weight you So I may feel those a little more-- dunno. North from Milford is the section I'm talking about. Out from Loveland, north is pretty good trail, but your up near YS now.
    Oh goodness, yes. That part is pretty bad.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •