
Originally Posted by
luv2climb
+1! I can't think of any good reason for it. I wish we didn't have to have it in apartments either. At least when you're a homeowner you can rip that bacteria sponge crap out, but when you rent, it seems like every landlord is infatuated with putting that beige crap in that shows every stain. Linoleum, tile, or laminate would pay for itself in the long run because it wouldn't get trashed as easily and it's much easier to keep clean. Once something liquid soaks into carpet, you're not getting it all up. Same with dirt. I've removed plenty of carpet and seen tons of dirt on the floor underneath. Yuck!
Also, all that dust and dirt can't be good for allergy sufferers. Luckily I don't have allergies.
I'm with you on the carpet thing--yuck. Besides the dirt/dust/allergy factor, I would much rather sweep/dust mop than push a heavy, loud vacuum cleaner around. My last apartment was all hardwood and linoleum floors; the place I am in now has carpet as did every other apartment I looked at here (but around here all the landlords seem to love putting in medium-blue carpet rather than beige). I think part of it has to do with noise reduction; people stomping around on a carpeted floor make less noise for the people below them than if they were stomping around on a hardwood floor.
2011 Surly LHT
1995 Trek 830