This is how I was looking at it, too. Is it safer to take the lane? Yes; but while the cyclist has a right to do so, you can also get a ticket for impeding traffic. Like Cataboo said, the road has pullouts, and they are there for slower moving traffic to use no matter what kind of vehicle they are in/on. There are places I dont ride because, even though I have a right to be there, it's not safe for me to ride there (sure, I can take the lane, but there are places I wouldn't drive a truck with a 5th-wheel trailer on, either). Some people have awesome skills and are fine on a descent at speed - there are many hills I ride where I am going as fast if not faster than vehicle traffic. Some people ride their brakes all the way down and impede traffic - and you can get ticketed for it. What's "safe" isn't always what's "right".
I see this as totally different. Almost everyone here has said that they would take the lane when needed to, because it IS safer to be there. But there is a difference in that you aren't doing hill repeats on a private, one lane road, or riding somewhere that may not be the best place in the world for cyclists.
I understand feeling guilty for being annoyed at a cyclist, too. But usually, I'm irritated at those jerks that give the rest of us a bad name like those who run red lights or ride on the wrong side of the path/street.




Reply With Quote