But Armstrong did test positive for EPO, he just couldn't be sanctioned because the samples were "B" samples. His people said he was exonerted; I'd hardly call it that. Like, Yeah, OJ was acquitted. There are many, many people who are speaking out about doping and, yes, going after Armstrong. I cannot begin to imagine the frustration of people who know the truth and have to listen to the DAMAGE CONTROL spin.
Also, Landis's emails went to the UCI and were leaked by someone there to the Wall Street Journal. Landis did not go to the press. Insofar as Landis's lying is concerned, is it any different from Armstrong's? Bold denials, payoffs, books written, appeals to the public....
My brother refers to Lance as Pharmstrong.

"Now finally the cycling community will realize that doping should be required of all riders in the tour. Testing should be used to merely confirm riders have the minimum levels of dope in their systems. That way it will be fair."

For a less cynical viewpoint try www.bikepure.org