Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Henniker, NH
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by ccbloom View Post
    I just went through the whole process of buying my first bike, and I learned that the wsd's are geared towards the avg. woman who has longer legs and a shorter torso. You sound like me (I'm 5'2") and have a longer torso and shorter legs.
    Hi. I know this post is a few days old but I just wanted to clarify this some. WSD bikes (which is Trek's brand name, btw, not a general term) are absolutely not made the way they are because of some generalization about proportions. In fact, during the research stage we found no scientific evidence that women on average have one proportionality moreso than men.

    We change the geometry of our bikes in order to deal with the fact that as women, our center of gravity is not located in the same place as that of a man, and it is for this reason that less reach and a higher hand position is more anatomically correct for most women (notice I did not say 'all').

    It is not about height.

    It is not about proportionality.

    If this is what you were told by a Trek dealer, please feel free to send me a PM and let me know which one it was. We train shop staff on the reasons why WSD bikes should be an option for women, and there are still a lot of shops who are getting it wrong.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    714
    I have (2) TREK WSDs and there's no other bike I've ever tried that fit me as well as they do. I have short arms, short legs, short torso... I'm overall pretty stubby . I have very small hands and what I love the most about my WSD is the wonderful spacing when I am on the hoods and need to get to my brakes and shifters. I also love the slightly narrower top bar -- it allows me to keep my arms loose and tucked in.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    "I never made "Who's Who"- but sure as hell I made "What's That??..."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,650
    It is also probably worth your while to run some searches here on TE regarding bikes for petite riders. You will no doubt come across a few discussions re: 700 v. 650.

    I'm 5'1" with a 27" inseam. My road bike has 650c wheels. I also ride a folding bike with 20" wheels, which I find extremely comfortable, and I love that it has a low stepover. I have a bad hip, so the low stepover makes it easier to get on and off, while I am not so graceful getting on and off my other bike.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Germantown, MD
    Posts
    17
    I have a Trek WSD 1600. With 650c tires.
    The smaller tires are really the key for me. I am only 4' 10" 1/2.
    And the bike is perfect for me!

    the bike is a 2007 model and I bought it new just about a month ago. I know that the Trek WSD's are above your budget. But think about spending more than you originally wanted to. Because if you spend $300 or $400 on something that isn't great, it is better to spend $800 or $900 on something you will love and want to ride every day. I originally was going to get the Trek 1.2 WSD model, but the bike shop happened to have one of the WSD 1600 there and I went ahead and shelled out the additional bucks for it.
    But the Trek 1.2 is around $900 I think, and seems to be a good bike.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Central MA
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by TrekWSDmechanic View Post
    Hi. I know this post is a few days old but I just wanted to clarify this some. WSD bikes (which is Trek's brand name, btw, not a general term) are absolutely not made the way they are because of some generalization about proportions. In fact, during the research stage we found no scientific evidence that women on average have one proportionality moreso than men.

    We change the geometry of our bikes in order to deal with the fact that as women, our center of gravity is not located in the same place as that of a man, and it is for this reason that less reach and a higher hand position is more anatomically correct for most women (notice I did not say 'all').

    It is not about height.

    It is not about proportionality.

    If this is what you were told by a Trek dealer, please feel free to send me a PM and let me know which one it was. We train shop staff on the reasons why WSD bikes should be an option for women, and there are still a lot of shops who are getting it wrong.
    To be honest, I can't remember if it was an actual Trek that the employee was referring to when he was telling me about it being for shorter torso/longer legs since I also tried out the Specialized women's bikes. Either way, that is the impression that I was given while testing the women's vs. men's bikes. I'm happy to give you the name of the LBS where I purchased the bike, though. I can say that my first 3 experiences with them were not great; however, as long as I get this one employee there, I'm more than satisfied since he's so helpful.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    71
    I've been told this at a Trek dealer. I can't remember if it was a Trek bike I was looking at when he said it, but he definitely said that since I had a long torso, I should look at men's bikes. Nothing about geometry or gravity or the fact that I have little stubby fingers. I'll send you the name of the shop.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •