You missed my point.
With THOSE NUMBERS it wouldn't have been published if it wasn't Lance because it wouldn't be suspicious if it wasn't Lance (which is to say it's not particularly suspicious).
It's a jerk "scientist" and a jerk journalist twisting the facts around and betting on the general public not having a clue what the numbers mean, what's normal, or how easily it is affected by normal things and also not caring enough or having access to the resources to look it up.




Reply With Quote