Liability/rides out of bike shop a no no/reversed?

[Irulan]

aside from other issues that make him sound like a creep...

I just stepped down from presidency of a bike club. The liability thing, coupled with how your insurance policy is written, is a very real issue for organizations. Who hosts a ride, where you host it, what you call it, whether you charge for it all that can factor in to whether your liability coverage will ( most likely) be in effect. I'd put my money on the ride changing from a "shop ride" to a "pickup/informal" ride to try and work within a policy.

IANAL, YMMV etc.

[Flur]

The guy sounds really ewww, yuck. It almost sounds as if he got rid of the group rides because he groped a woman who was on the ride and she complained. Maybe she threatened to press charges and that was the "liability"? You're probably better off if you ride with one of the groups he's not involved with.

[Crankin]

I wouldn't ride with that guy because he sounds like a moron. But, liability was a big issue for AMC a couple of years ago. Not because of a lawsuit, but before, rides were always led with the knowledge that sometimes everyone didn't stay together, although we always have to have a sweep. The lawyers could not see the difference between leading a ride and a hike or x country skiing. We do have everyone sign a liability release. After 2 years of arguing, the executive committee said they would be "lax" in interpreting the rules for us. But, a lot of the cycling leaders quit. What we do is clearly state that if you go ahead of the leader, tell us and you are "off" the ride, and there is no liability involved for us.
In reality, there have been a couple of times that both my husband and I have told a couple of people to go ahead on the climbs because they were hammering at a pace that was not conducive to the group. When I had to do this, I was leading a hill ride that I was supposed to be the sweep on. But, my husband had a medical emergency, so I had to lead a ride on a 95 degree day, with about 2,000 feet of climbing (Lost Lake in Groton). I knew a couple of the guys could climb faster than me, so I appointed my friend's husband to keep them under control and wait for me and the rest of the group. It worked out fine, but it was sort of skirting the rules.

[ny biker]

Seriously, there is no way I would ever patronize a store like that. And I'd be sure to tell my friends to stay away, too.

[Irulan]

Seriously, there is no way I would ever patronize a store like that. And I'd be sure to tell my friends to stay away, too.

Like which? Creepy guy who creeps out women, or requires a liability waiver? The first is easily avoided, the second is more or less pretty standard.

[ny biker]

Like which? Creepy guy who creeps out women, or requires a liability waiver? The first is easily avoided, the second is more or less pretty standard.

The one who thinks that groping women is okay.

Someone should ask how he would feel if a guy did that to his wife or his mother. Or his daughter.

[Biciclista]

The one who thinks that groping women is okay.

Someone should ask how he would feel if a guy did that to his wife or his mother. Or his daughter.

you can't reason with someone who believes he's done nothing wrong. we had a guy fired from here a few years ago who was like that.

[Irulan]

Wasn't there a thread a few months ago regarding a woman who had endured that kind of treatment from an LBS employee, and then followed through on reporting it? I just can not understand not doing something.

[Blueberry]

Wasn't there a thread a few months ago regarding a woman who had endured that kind of treatment from an LBS employee, and then followed through on reporting it? I just can not understand not doing something.

Yep - but it was an employee of a chain (I think a mechanic). This is a shop owner - I'm not sure there's much you can do, except not shop there and tell others not to.

Liability issues, I get. I'm a lawyer. Rude people who know no limits - I don't.

CA