Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wellesley, MA
    Posts
    361
    I had a long response typed out, but the kitten just deleted it!

    From what I read today (see the Bontrager thread), we actually do put significant weight on the pubic rami- sometimes more there than on the ischial tuberosities. Especially in the drops, you should be able to tip the pelvis forward onto the rami and be supported. My current saddle unfortunately also tries to support a lot at the pubic symphysis (and thus girly bits), so I'm still hunting for one that has the right shape up front. I'm trying the Lithia tonight on the trainer and have a SMP TRK on order, but if those don't work, maybe I'll try out the new Bontrager.

    For those non-anatomists:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,708
    Quote Originally Posted by mayanorange View Post
    I agree with these guys- I have 145ish sitbones and need 155-160 in my saddle width.

    There's new data out on Bontrager's site and in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise that shows we don't actually sit on our sitbones on the saddle as much as is lore. But I still think the whole pelvis width needs support and from where you say you are raw- it's either to narrow or too much curve right to left.

    Discussion of the bontrager info here: http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=25618
    This was a saddle I was asking about recently also. My lbs did not have it yet last I checked. Just the sit tool. Thx for the link. What always kills me in the lbs when I tell them my sitz bones are not on the saddle is the sales rep insistance that a 155+ saddle is soooooo wide... like omg, lady, NO ONE needs that big! Where do these folks come from? Twiggy land? Ribs you can count on me, yes. But I didn't push out 10# kids being a Twiggy in the lower half. The bones down there are way wider on my pearish body.

    Quote Originally Posted by mayanorange View Post
    I had a long response typed out, but the kitten just deleted it!

    From what I read today (see the Bontrager thread), we actually do put significant weight on the pubic rami- sometimes more there than on the ischial tuberosities. Especially in the drops, you should be able to tip the pelvis forward onto the rami and be supported. My current saddle unfortunately also tries to support a lot at the pubic symphysis (and thus girly bits), so I'm still hunting for one that has the right shape up front. I'm trying the Lithia tonight on the trainer and have a SMP TRK on order, but if those don't work, maybe I'll try out the new Bontrager.

    For those non-anatomists:
    God Bless you for finding this in google. I kept doing searches and didn't find this good of a diagram. Inferior pubic ramus... if that is part of the downward sloping bone to the sitz... that's where I think my pressure rests. Seems like Knott once posted a name for that inner line of the bell curve "ishchial something something". I know when one rolls forward to more aero, like hoods to drops, you will be hedging towards the inside of the bell curve. I tried to pick some flater toped saddles, vs sloped. Maybe the slight slope is hitting wrong. I think it's close, but not quite. btw... the cat kicked me out too earlier, thus how I ended up coming back later... thx for persistance in posting.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •