Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Mystery Hub

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,556

    Mystery Hub

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Here's a mechanical puzzler for those so inclined. Today I was doing a tune-up on a Raleigh Super Course, probably a late 60s or early 70s model, definitely before 1973. The tag specifically said to true the rear wheel well. It had some very loose spokes (luckily loose in the right direction) so I started truing. Then I noticed that the hub had play, so I removed the freewheel (a very odd 3-prong freewheel made in England that I'd never seen before, though our shop had the proper tool to remove it) to adjust the hub. The hub had quite a bit of play, but was also binding in spots. I adjusted it as well as I could and started truing again. The wheel was impossible to true. I'd spin the wheel in one direction, find where the rim hit the truing stand caliper, spin it the other way, and that spot missed the caliper by 3 mm. What was wrong with the hub? I'll let you all guess the usual things first, then I'll tell you what it's not and give a couple more clues. This is such an odd one that I may have to give out a prize if someone guesses correctly.
    Oil is good, grease is better.

    2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
    1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
    1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norwood, MA
    Posts
    484
    Since you adjusted the hub I assume that you checked that the axle wasn't bent or broken, that you had the right number & size of bearings, the cups & cones looked OK, and both locknuts were tight. I'm suspecting that at some point in this hubs life it's been serviced and a damaged dustcap was replaced with an eyeball fit, or that some of the spacers were replaced but not the correct size. I want more clues, please.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    I'm not sure if I can phrase this concept correctly - I'm going to guess that the hub was of an excessively malleable metal, and over time being out of true, the flanges became bent so they're misaligned with each other. Like, when both flanges are vertical, the axle is NOT horizontal.

    That's my guess and I'm sticking to it
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by newfsmith View Post
    Since you adjusted the hub I assume that you checked that the axle wasn't bent or broken, that you had the right number & size of bearings, the cups & cones looked OK, and both locknuts were tight. I'm suspecting that at some point in this hubs life it's been serviced and a damaged dustcap was replaced with an eyeball fit, or that some of the spacers were replaced but not the correct size. I want more clues, please.
    I was not supposed to overhaul the hub (beyond the scope of work), so I was trying to avoid opening it up. By adjusting it, I knew that the locknuts were tight and the axle wasn't broken. I first suspected a bent axle, but inspecting with the hub together indicated the axle was straight, and that was confirmed when I did open the hub and roll the axle on the bench. Here are the most telling clues. I opened the hub and looked at one cone. It had normal wear: a ball-track line about 2 mm thick with obvious wear but no significant pitting. The 2nd cone had very abnormal wear, and a type of wear I'd never seen before. Instead of the usual narrow ball-track, it had wear over it's entire surface and some pits towards the edge of the inner surface, far from the normal wear area. I looked inside the hub where the cone with normal wear had been, and it looked normal, nine 1/4 inch ball bearings. But what did I see in the other side?
    Oil is good, grease is better.

    2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
    1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
    1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norwood, MA
    Posts
    484
    3/16 bearings, maybe even 10?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,867
    Marbles? Bee-bees? Gumballs? birdshot?

    Karen

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,556
    Ten 1/4 inch bearings. They didn't fit in a single circle, so two were out of the plane they should have been in. Hence the wear over a wide part of the cone. And the odd behavior truing the wheel, as the location of the out-of-plane bearings could change. So I removed one bearing, put the hub back together, and trued the wheel easily.

    My other adventures with the 1960s Raleigh Super Course included attempting to remove a cotter pin to adjust the bottom bracket. The shop had the 15 inch long VAR cotter pin tool like we had at my shop in the 70s (except ours was wooden and this was metal), but the only thing that did was start bending the threaded part of the cotter pin. So I decided to leave well enough alone and managed to adjust the bottom bracket with the arm and cotter pin on. Then I spent some time truing the steel crankset. The inside ring trued pretty easily by bending the arms, but the outside ring had all kinds of small-scale wobbles. The VAR chainring truing tool allowed me to improve it, but I didn't get it perfectly true. It has Simplex plastic derailleurs, and the cage on the front derailleur is quite narrow, hence the gears couldn't be adjusted well with an out-of-true chainring.
    Oil is good, grease is better.

    2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
    1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
    1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Concord, MA
    Posts
    13,394
    Deb, are you working at a shop? Where????

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Belle, Mo.
    Posts
    1,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Crankin View Post
    Deb, are you working at a shop? Where????
    I was going to ask the same thing! I know you went to the Bicycle Institute...must have paid off?????
    Claudia

    2009 Trek 7.6fx
    2013 Jamis Satellite
    2014 Terry Burlington

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    oh, was it missing some of it's ball bearings???!
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,556
    It had one too many bearings on one side. Hence the very odd wear pattern on the cone. BTW, the customer was really impressed that I found the problem with his wheel.

    I'm working at Frank's Spoke'n'Wheel in Sudbury. Love it. All the cool bike tools from the 70s can be found hiding somewhere in the shop. Today I needed to replace an axle and cones, and we had them. There are even 10-20 year old brand new bikes and frames sitting in the attic - Bianchis, Bridgestones. I've got my eye on the 52 cm Bridgestone MB-3 from 1994.
    Oil is good, grease is better.

    2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
    1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
    1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •