Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 38

Threaded View

  1. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    Quote Originally Posted by sundial View Post
    What's nice about the S model is that it forces you to sit back further on the saddle rather than ride on the nose.
    Since the rails run short on Brooks saddles, one suggestion I can make is to consider a setback seatpost with a looong setback.
    I know we all have different experiences, and I must relate my own experience, having ridden thousands of miles on both "S" model and non-S.
    The rails on the S model are about 1.5" shorter than the rails on the non S. Thus, if you position your saddle all the way back on its rails, the back edge of the S model was always more forward on the bike than my non-S model. For me, this put my center of gravity way too far forward and i had too much weight falling forward onto my hands. Just my own experience of course.

    Just as an interesting visual comparison of the "S" vs. the non-S Brooks saddles...

    Here is my Rivendell Rambouillet with its original B17S saddle when I first got the bike:


    And here is the same bike a couple years later with a B68 (not an "S" model), same seatpost:


    Note also how I initially had my saddle set pretty low when i first got my bike. It seemed so scary tall! lol!
    Last edited by BleeckerSt_Girl; 04-25-2010 at 06:55 PM.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •