I've done some reading on these two aspects of geometry, but need some more feedback...
Seat Tube Angle (STA):
The fitter has noted for me 74degrees is a good STA. I've read stock average is between 73-75degrees. My femurs are probably shorter than average in comparison to the rest of my body proportions.
In reading here, some of you with long femurs do well with a 73 STA to get enough set back. In searching geos in smaller frames, the STA seems to be steeper for most brands...
I realize my position could be moved back (with a steeper STA), but it increases reach. Which I have that problem now with my frame that's too big for me...
So, I'm almost thinking I'm better off going with a 73 STA and being moved forward. Which I assume then would shorten my reach, and could be addressed with a longer stem if needed from my ideal TT size...
BUT... what does this moving forward do to your knee position?
Crank Arm Length:
I found a link to an article on bike fit from an old thread that gave an equation regarding crank arm length...
According to that, 165 would seem ideal for me. That's what's on my "overall non-fitting bike" right now as stock. The fitter wrote down 170. It seems like most smaller frames come normally with smaller cranks.
If my legs are average/shorter, would a 165 be better? Or are there other reasons?
The fitter comes very well recommended, so I'd try it... but just looking for some answers from others if there is a reason a longer crank could be a better fit.
TYIA![]()




Reply With Quote
. Me, on the other hand, hasn't gotten there yet *sigh*.
