The forum has changed!

[Red Rock]

Jeff and IT crew,

I just wanted to pass on my thanks for your efforts this week in trying to get all this up and running. I know, I don't post a whole lot but I was visiting while all of this was going on. You all have done and are contiuning to do a wonderful job.

Thanks for time and effort.

Red Rock

[jobob]

Jeff and IT crew,

I may be mistaken, but I think Jeff IS the IT crew.

[malkin]

I may be mistaken, but I think Jeff IS the IT crew.

Four person IT department: Jeff, himself, he and him?

[Catrin]

When I go to the "new posts" link, and the list exceeds 1 page in length, I am unable to navigate to the second page. There is an error message that says the search was unsuccessful.

[bmccasland]

Catrin - I was able to see the second page.

[Catrin]

Catrin - I was able to see the second page.

Interesting, because I still can't regardless of which computer I am on or browser. I get the message that there were no "matches" and to try another search term. Which browser are you using? I use either Chrome or Firefox, and Windows 7 (if that matters).

[goldfinch]

Catrin, I have the same problem. I use Chrome.

[Blueberry]

I'm on Windows 7 with Firefox and not having an that issue, Catrin. Maybe clear cookies/cache?

[laura*]

When I go to the "new posts" link, and the list exceeds 1 page in length, I am unable to navigate to the second page. There is an error message that says the search was unsuccessful.

I've noticed the list being "1 to 17 of 23" and then there's no link to a second page. Or - the first page will say "1 to 25 of 34" and the second page has just three topics and says "26 to 28 of 34".

You probably hit the magic number of new posts where you were offered a link to the second page, but there really weren't any posts to show on that page.

[withm]

When I go to the "new posts" link, and the list exceeds 1 page in length, I am unable to navigate to the second page. There is an error message that says the search was unsuccessful.

I have the same problem. Using Windows XP and IE 8 on one computer, and Windows 7 and IE9 on the other.

Also, when I click on the link to read the first unread post in a thread, if there is a post from someone whom I am ignoring in the recent postings, nothing will happen at all. The "button" does not work at all.

And finally, will it be possible to get "Ignore thread" back with this new format?

Thanks.

[Blueberry]

And finally, will it be possible to get "Ignore thread" back with this new format?

Thanks.

I was going to ask the same thing - and I double checked. Ignore thread has re-appeared under thread tools for me. Hope it has for you too!

[withm]

I was going to ask the same thing - and I double checked. Ignore thread has re-appeared under thread tools for me. Hope it has for you too!

Nope - I have 3 options under thread tools, and ignore isn't one of them... Odd that you have it and I don't?

[administrator]

The Ignore Thread is appearing in some themes, but not others. It works in VB4Default and Blue Theme, but not in any of the Luburox themes. You can switch to Blue Theme, ignore the thread, and then switch back to Luburox and the thread should still be ignored. I haven't been able to figure out yet why it isn't working properly in the Luburox themes.

[emily_in_nc]

I have a different issue that cropped up with the new forum. It's not a "bug" but just something that bugs me. When I go to the forum, I always click on "New Posts". In the old forum, that would only show me threads with new posts since my last visit. Now, in addition (and following) those, I get a whole slew of posts under "The threads below have not been updated since your last visit but still contain unread posts." Is there any way to turn that off. If I didn't read them before, I don't want to read 'em this time around either. It makes my "new posts" search go on for page after page.

Minor, I know, but just one of those niggling little changes I don't care for.

Thanks!

[Possegal]

The only way I've found around that Emily is to read the ones that are new that I want to read and the click to mark all posts read. That's the only work-around to that aspect that I've figured out.