Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 36

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532

    WSD vs Men's Bikes

    Other than step-throughs, what are the differences between WSD and Men's bikes? A lot of women ride Men's, right? Is there a certain kind of body type that is more suited to a Men's frame?

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    3,436
    Major diff---shorter top tube in WSDs, for those of us with relatively short arms and torsos. It was definitely something I needed to get. So, conversely, women with longer arms and/or torsos may do fine or better with men's frames.
    "My predominant feeling is one of gratitude. I have loved and been loved;I have been given much and I have given something in return...Above all, I have been a sentient being, a thinking animal, on this beautiful planet, and that in itself has been an enormous privilege and an adventure." O. Sacks

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532
    Ah, okay! That makes sense. I think I have longish arms and torso probably average for my height -- 5'8". Of course, I'll find out for sure when I start actually testing new bikes.

    Thanks for the info.

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    WSD is does not mean step-through. Step-through is simply a type of frame, commonly called a mixte or the woman's version of a hybrid. Waterford, Bob Jackon, Mercian, etc. are a few of the very short list of companies that I know of that actually make serious road bikes in a step-through or mixte design; you probably won't run into any of these unless you try really, really hard. Many standard road bikes today have sloping top tubes but not enough to be called a mixte.

    Shorter top tube, maybe shorter cranks, narrower bars, shorter reach brakes, maybe lighter tubing, different saddle. There are a number of things that may make a bike "WSD." Of course, some companies simply paint it a different color and call it WSD.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Kent, Washington state
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by SadieKate View Post
    Many standard road bikes today have sloping top tubes but not enough to be called a mixte.
    The sloping top tube is not enough to make such a bike into a mixte. A true mixte has DOUBLE top tubes.

    (Like most of my bikes... )

    East Hill

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    steuben county new york
    Posts
    626
    Pooks, Fuji makes a yellow bike called the Roubaix..Its not a WSD though if thats what you're looking for..am getting mine fitted right now. Waiting on a comfortable saddle before I take her out..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Quote Originally Posted by East Hill View Post
    The sloping top tube is not enough to make such a bike into a mixte. A true mixte has DOUBLE top tubes.

    (Like most of my bikes... )

    East Hill
    Yes . I just didn't want to get into all the details and design issues and confusion. Xeney's current single speed project is a good example.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    Quote Originally Posted by pooks View Post
    Ah, okay! That makes sense. I think I have longish arms and torso probably average for my height -- 5'8". Of course, I'll find out for sure when I start actually testing new bikes.

    Thanks for the info.
    If you are 5'8" with longish arms, in my opinion the odds are that you can be comfortably fit to a "regular" bike. You might consider getting a "slightly" shorter stem than they would normally put on for a man though- like maybe 2cm shorter than their usual stem. Of course everyone is different...
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,532
    Thanks again, more good info!

    “Hey, clearly failure doesn’t deter me!”

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Top of Parrett Mountain, Oregon
    Posts
    453
    I am 5'8" and ride a WSD. Suzie is 5'9" and with longer arms than I have, and she rides a WSD. Suzie and I ride Pilots that are the same frame size. I had my stem and handlebars swapped out to make the bike fit me well. Suzie is having problems with her saddle, that is all, and she doesn't appear to have any fit problems.

    Pooks, when I selected my WSD last year, it was based more on having had bikes in my past that were men's bikes, and there was always something about those bikes that made my rides uncomfortable. I biked anyway because cycling brings me great joy, but I hated it that the bikes were designed for a male, and not for a female. The bike I have now is the best bike of my life and I will need a dramatic change in my physical condition to make me desire another bike.

    When you go to look at bikes, keep an open mind. A men's bike might suit you, but then again, a WSD might suit you too. Since you are brand new to road bikes, you might consider renting one first to get used to a road bike, before you look to purchase.

    Darcy

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Lisa S.H. View Post
    If you are 5'8" with longish arms, in my opinion the odds are that you can be comfortably fit to a "regular" bike. You might consider getting a "slightly" shorter stem than they would normally put on for a man though- like maybe 2cm shorter than their usual stem. Of course everyone is different...
    Very good Lisa!!!!

    I'm 5'8" have very long arms and a regular torso. I ride a 58 cm regular (not WSD) bike. And I've replaced the 110 mm stem with a 90mm.
    "Being retired from Biking...isn't that kinda like being retired from recess?" Stephen Colbert asked of Lance Armstrong

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,315
    It's not just arm length. It's about effective torso length, which has to do with the reach of your arms, your actual torso length, lower back flexibility, etc. A lot of long waisted people need to sit more upright for lower back comfort and even though the torso is tall, the effective reach is shorter than another person their height.

    Femur length may also be a factor. A woman with longer femurs may need to sit back farther to get the proper knee position relative to the pedal axle, and thus the bars get even farther away.

    The best thing is to go sit on a bunch of different bikes. Women's components like bars and saddles can be added easily to a regular bike.

    If the top tube is too short, you may feel stiffness in your shoulders (you may tend to hunch the shoulders to have straighter elbows and take weight off your hands and pressure off your triceps), or you may feel that your elbows are in your lap, or that there's a hunch in your back.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •