Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Which fork?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Lisa, my memory is fuzzy too (especially at the end of a Friday), but iirc you were initially considering running a wider tire than 25c, and I thought that could be problematic depending on the fork chosen. I think most carbon forks can handle 25c fine, but going larger (as the next larger width is usually 30c) would likely be problematic.

    I am glad I snatched up a pile of 650c Ouzo Pro's last year, enough for at least a year or two, as finding a nice carbon fork that isn't extremely "aero" (and super stiff) is getting harder and harder. Fortunately, there will probably always be a good variety of 700c offerings, or at least we can hope

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    Thanks for all the great information. Just a few more points/questions:

    Jobob, there are still some Ouzo Pros to be had online, especially with a 43 rake, if you can go that route with Lynskey.

    I'd love to use the Edge Composite fork. I've read nothing but rave reviews, but they don't come in a 44 or 45 rake. Boo hoo!

    SadieKate, what fork did you end up with?

    Margo, what is considered light as far as carbon goes? The Alpha Q weighs in at 345 grams I think.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Quote Originally Posted by indysteel View Post
    SadieKate, what fork did you end up with?
    The Reynolds UL.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355
    Margo, what is considered light as far as carbon goes? The Alpha Q weighs in at 345 grams I think.
    I hate to say it but I haven't compared carbon fork weights for a fair amount of time. Last time I did, Reynolds and Easton offered the lightest options.

    I have the earlier version of the Reynolds Ouzo Pro UL on my road bike (same fork, more or less, but has a matte finish), and it rides very nice.

    I haven't gotten involved much with True Temper as far as forks go, but their reputation is good amongst builders. The sleeve you have to bond inside of the steerer (I am not sure that is still the case) was a turn off for me at the time. Plus, at the time I was comparing, they didn't offer any decent 650c options, which is important for me too.

    You know, 43mm of rake is still verrrrry close to 45. If you can get an Edge fork in that configuration and you are okay with the aesthetics, you may be happier with that over the TT in 44mm.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •