Bicycle sizing for my girlfriend..

[1150A]

My girlfriend came to my cross race last weekend and mentioned she really would like to try it since it looks so fun. Before investing into a nice cx bike, I thought maybe she will fit OK or even pretty well on one of my bikes.

She's 5'5" and fairly proportionate. I am also the same height. I have two bikes, and it'd be really nice for me, financially, if she could use one of my bikes, and maybe, if needed, change things up to have it fit better. I was just curious what everyone that is about the same height (5'5") as her rides?

The bike I was hoping she could use is my 52cm Surly Cross Check.

The thing is, when I had just gotten into cycling, I bought her a pretty small bicycle that she had gotten fairly used to. I was also riding the same size, but soon realized it was way too small for me. That frameset has a 49cm TT. When she gets on my bike, she says it feels huge. I'm not sure if it really is, or if she's just used to her smaller bike. She also noticed how close the top tube was when standing over my bike. How much clearance should their be down there?

Of course, I know I could get this all solved by getting fitted, but I thought I'd try checking with you guys first.

Thanks!

[VeloVT]

It's hard to say. Depends on the bike, the setup, and her proportions. You can get a rough idea of whether her torso is much shorter than yours or not by comparing inseams. If her inseam is much longer than yours, she probably needs a smaller frame. (Because her torso is relatively smaller for the same height).

As to bike frame size --
I'm 5'6".

I have a 52cm Bianchi Axis that fits me perfectly. It has a 53.9 cm virtual top tube. I'm running a 90mm stem with a substantial positive rise, maybe 10 degrees.

I also have a 49cm Scott Contessa CR1 pro that fits me beautifully. It has a 51.5 cm virtual top tube. I'm running a 120mm -6 degree stem on it.

The Scott is a much more aggressive position with much more saddle-bar drop, but both bikes fit me well and they are very different frame sizes and setups.

So it's just hard to say . But it's worth a try. It seems at least plausible that your bikes could fit her.

[BleeckerSt_Girl]

I'm 5'5". I have a 54cm Rivendell which is 'about' the right size, though I could probably be comfy on their 52cm as well (never tried one though).
No one needs more than a 1/2" of standover, technically speaking. That's about what I have on my Riv.
You ought to measure and compare your two heights from floor to pubic bone however- that's more accurate and will tell you more than overall body height.
Here's how:
http://www.rivbike.com/article/bike_..._to_measure_it

[Pedal Wench]

No one needs more than a 1/2" of standover, technically speaking.

Even on a cross bike?

[BleeckerSt_Girl]

Even on a cross bike?

What i mean is, lots of people get nervous when they have less than one or two inches of clearance- but you can get as close as 1/2" standover clearance and still be just fine. I'm talking bikes in general, not cross bike geometry specifically.

[1150A]

Even on a cross bike?

I think that's what makes her uncomfortable the most.. There's not much room down there.

Though, I was concerned about that myself at first, I can probably lift up my front wheel about an inch when standing over it. It was kind of scary knowing how close it was at first, but it's not really a problem.. yet.

[1150A]

Unfortunately, the Surly has a 54cm TT..

[VeloVT]

It might be OK. As I said, my Axis (which is a CX bike) has a 53.9 tt -- I don't think that 0.1 cm would make that much difference . What kind of stem do you have on it?

[1150A]

It might be OK. As I said, my Axis (which is a CX bike) has a 53.9 tt -- I don't think that 0.1 cm would make that much difference . What kind of stem do you have on it?

A 120 at the moment.. I'll put the 90 from my current bike onto that one to see how she likes it.

[Cataboo]

I think you want a bit more than half an inch for a cross bike and definitely more for a mountain bike.

Hower, road bikes I think standover height is somewhat overrated - as long as I don't feel like I'm racking myself, I'm fine with whatever on road bikes.

[uforgot]

Unfortunately, the Surly has a 54cm TT..

Yup! The Surly Cross Check sizing is mis-leading. I have a 46cm Cross Check and it is larger than my 53cm Burly was. Has 52.8cm top tube which is perfect for me, and your effective top tube is actually 54.7. I also have about a 31.5" inseam which is somewhat long for my height, 5'5" on a good day. Mine has a 29.6" standover whereas your 52cm has a 30.6". Not sure I'd like it that close.

[roguedog]

use this: http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...LCULATOR_INTRO

it'll get ya into a decent ball park and then you'll know how you might play around with stems and what not to get the fit in the ball park or.. if it jsut outright might not be a good fit.

though this is more road oriented fit. i dunno if cross might have a slightly different fit since typically the bb are higher than road bikes.

again, this'll probably get you in the ball park and reduce your guessing range ..?

anyway, it'll be fun and interesting. did this with a friend.. and we had lots of laughs and "argued" over the measurements, requiring 2 or 3 measurements. i measured myself and then had an lbs fit and it put me in the general ballpark. your results may differ.. depending on who wins the argument