Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Now that you have the bike and tire change kit (congrats!), it's a good idea to practice changing a tire a few times. That way, when you get a flat out on a ride, you'll know what to do.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Limbo
    Posts
    8,769
    Quote Originally Posted by SillyMia View Post
    After my mountain bike got stolen, I convinced my husband to let me upgrade to a road bike
    The only person I have to get permission from is me
    Which explains how I ended up with five bikes in one year
    2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
    2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
    2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    72
    Jenny,

    I have looked around at small bikes a LOT because I am just barely 5' tall, and I recently bought a new bike for my 4'8" daughter. I have one suggestion for you. We found that my daughter (who is shorter than you, but very leggy and has a similar inseam) could ride a Giant FCR Women's in size XXXSmall. The FCR is a flat bar road bike as that is what she wanted, but they also make the OCR in women's sizes that has drop bars. For 2008, they no longer have the XXXS size (has 650's). I'm not sure if they made that size in 2007. I started calling around and a couple of Giant dealers still had or could get 2006 bikes in 3XS for around $500. Actually, I really scored as I found her one on eBay that was a 2006 FCR 2 ($700 MSRP and a step up from the entry level FCR 3). The bike was like new with less than 10 miles on it, and I got it for less than $300, plus shipping. It is very pretty, light and fast! Compared to her cheap mountain bike, she is in heaven.

    One more thing - if you look up the bike's geometry in the archives at Giant's website, don't be put off by the standover measurement. They measure standover 12" in front of the seat tube, not in the center of the sloping top tube. On such a small bike, 12" is about 2/3 of the way up the sloped top tube. Thus, it says something like 27" standover for my daughter's bike and that is quite misleading. She can straddle the top bar with a bit of clearance with no problem.



    Quote Originally Posted by JennyPi View Post
    First post! Yipee! I have decided to stop lurking now that I have found the perfect (ladies) forum where I feel comfortable enough to converse with you all.

    I am also vertically challenged. At 4'11.5'' I'm finding it increasingly challenging to find a bicycle that is in my price range ($500-600) and fits. My inseam is 27''. In order to have 2 inches of stand over clearance I'm going to have to find the smallest bike out there. I test rode the Trek 1.2, 43cm 650c and even that was a bit too big for me Wish me luck! And ... any suggestions???

    Thanks,

    Jenny

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    102
    Another vertically challenged rider here (just over 5'). Have really struggled to get a road bike with a short enough top tube. I obviously needed 650 wheels - but even many of the bikes w/ 650 wheels were too long. I had a very short Cannondale (now for sale) in polished aluminium in about a 44cm which fitted me very well - but I hankered after titanium . . .

    I am now the proud owner of a Serotta Fierte TI 46p (second hand ebay purchase) - which also has a very short top tube (I think about 48.5cm). Both bikes fit me really well - can't agree more with the person who said fit is everything. I also got FSA wing pro bars in compact which have a very shallow reach & drop. Then I double shimmed my ultegra sti levers to bring the levers really close to my hands. My the hoops we short girls have to jump through . . .

    Smaller wheels are great - more aerodynamic, lighter, stronger . . . that's why triathletes & time triallists used them for a while (not sure why they went off them - might have been a lack of tyre choice?)

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SF. Ain't it perdy?
    Posts
    33
    Thank you all for your input. I'm dashing to work now but I wanted to assure you all that I have read your replies. I'll keep you all posted on my journey to find the perfect bike, or maybe the not-so-perfect bike that I will be willing to work with

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,716
    I have 650's on my tri bike and it doesn't seem to affect my speed at all.

    I will say that tires and tubes are hard to come by. If you do end up with 650 wheels, if you don't have a local shop with that in stock, or if you want more options, you will probably have to order your tires and tubes off the internet.

    Good luck on the new roadie!
    "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather, to skid in broadside thoroughly used-up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: WOW WHAT A RIDE!!!!"

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    8,548
    here's a good link for you:


    http://www.myra-simon.com/bike/petitest.html
    Mimi Team TE BIANCHISTA
    for six tanks of gas you could have bought a bike.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •