Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Quote Originally Posted by esther231
    I'm just getting back into biking after years of raising the kids. I went looking this weekend. I'm 5' tall. The bike store measured my inseam said I should buy a 47 frame. I tried it. I could do it but then I tried a 43 frame and felt happier on it. But it looks so small.

    I will be riding with my husband who will (obviously) be on a bigger bike. Does a smaller frame mean I have to work harder to ride the same speed he does?

    I'm so confused. I really liked the smaller frame but don't want to be left in the dust.
    Actually no, it means that you'll have to carry less frame weight, so you can go faster! And of course, the more comfortable you feel on your bike, the harder and longer you'll be able to ride.

    Your 43cm frame came with 650c wheels, correct? They're smaller than your husband's 700c wheels (which is what most people use) so make sure you always carry your own saddle bag with a 650c spare tube. If you get a flat, his 700c tube won't fit your 650c tire.

    Happy riding,

    ~Cari

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lakewood, Co
    Posts
    1,061
    Standover height is not the only thing you need to consider when trying bikes, top tube length, femur and arm length is important as well.

    Were the 2 bikes you tried the same brand and model? Bike companies measure differently so a smaller bike from one company may be similiar in geometry to a larger sized bike from another company.

    Here's a good article on how to properly fit a bicycle.

    http://womenspecific.com/cycling/35/...men-specific--

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    123

    Bike size

    Oh, that's a great point. They were different models. The 43 was the TREK pilot 1.2 WSD. The 47 was a cannondale but not a WSD. They'll try to bring in a 47 pilot 1.2 this coming weekend so I can try it.

    You think the Pilot 1.2 is decent? Should I stretch to upgrade to 2.1? Big jump in price.......is it worth it?

    Bikes have changed so much since I was riding. lol OMG, it's incredible how light they are. And the gearing is different.

    The tires were smaller than his. I think on the 43 they are the 650. That's why I started thinking I would always be the last one in on any ride I went on with anyone on a larger bike. That's a good tip. Thanks for it.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lakewood, Co
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by esther231
    Oh, that's a great point. They were different models. The 43 was the TREK pilot 1.2 WSD. The 47 was a cannondale but not a WSD. They'll try to bring in a 47 pilot 1.2 this coming weekend so I can try it.

    You think the Pilot 1.2 is decent? Should I stretch to upgrade to 2.1? Big jump in price.......is it worth it?

    Bikes have changed so much since I was riding. lol OMG, it's incredible how light they are. And the gearing is different.

    The tires were smaller than his. I think on the 43 they are the 650. That's why I started thinking I would always be the last one in on any ride I went on with anyone on a larger bike. That's a good tip. Thanks for it.
    Esther,

    I looked at the Trek website at the specs for the Pilot 1.2 and 2.1. Yes, definitely go for the 2.1 if you can. There is an upgrade in components, shifters, brakes, etc. which you'll be a lot happier with.

    The 47cm has 700c wheels. I ride 650c's and I don't think I'm slower than anyone else.

    A friend of mine has the Pilot, not sure which model but she loves it.

    FWIW, I'm building a custom frame, which is due Tues., but the frame size is 48cm and designed for 650c wheeels. My Aegis is a 44cm. I'm 5'1" with a 28" inseam. Don't know yet what the standover is going to be on the new frame.

    Good luck with your purchase.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    123

    Thank you all

    Well, I'm happy.

    I feel confident that if I find myself happier on what looks like a kid's bike , I still might be able to keep up with the bigger bikes. At least stay in hollaring distance. Said hopefully.

    I'll see if I can get that price down some. If they'll met me part way, I can swing it. Hope so. Not sure yet but hope so.

    Much thanks.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lakewood, Co
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by esther231
    Well, I'm happy.

    I feel confident that if I find myself happier on what looks like a kid's bike , I still might be able to keep up with the bigger bikes. At least stay in hollaring distance. Said hopefully.

    I'll see if I can get that price down some. If they'll met me part way, I can swing it. Hope so. Not sure yet but hope so.

    Much thanks.
    My friends in Cincinnati said my bike was so small it looked like it came out of a Cracker Jack box!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lakewood, Co
    Posts
    1,061
    Esther,

    It sounds like the 07's are starting to come in maybe they'll give you a deal on an 06

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    123
    lol Good description. This one too.

    Cross your fingers for me.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •