Here's my 2-cent... been discussing at work quite a bit and alot of people are in agreement with you but I see it as this... American Idol is a talent contest based on talent, appeal, bankability, and mold-ability. In other words, raw talent that the producers can take mold into whatever they want to mold the singer into and the singer must have enough appeal people will want to come and see them perform. Chris is not that moldable but is talented.
At first I couldn't much stand Taylor. But once you get through the contortions, weird faces and body movements and actually listen to his voice, it's very pleasant. He does have raw talent and you can see that his talent and apperance can be changed through coaching and counseling. Plus Taylor has appeal - he's the sweet guy, with a sweet smile that got a big break. As he said is now living the "American Dream" and you feel good for him. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
I have been a Chris Daughtry fan from day one but I think he went as far as he could - he has a awesome voice but his style does not appeal to the masses, in other words, he's not pop, country or soul. Alternative Chris will do well. He got the recognition he needed and I'm sure we will be seeing alot of him in the future. And of course, we will see Kat if nothing else because of her beauty.
But Taylor for me was the perfect "American Idol." A kid, playing in little clubs who got his big break and ran with it. Each week he got more and more sophisticated looking and he started to tone down his geekiness. He's actually a cute guy and is very well spoken. He will serve the AI producers well. I might even play his album when he makes it. Who knows.
On another note - the Fox channel here (I'm in the LA area) made a comment about Clay Aiken and called him "Clay-d Lang" (after KD Lang). He looked really weird to me.



Reply With Quote
