
Originally Posted by
gabrielle
Probably...I've just heard a couple of horror stories from friends whose claims were denied/reduced *even though they had proper documents* because the insurance rep just didn't believe that a bike could cost that much.
I would have started a complaint against the agent/rep/company with Oregon’s Department of Consumer and Business Services, which handles insurance complaints and then found a better company. There can sometimes be a big difference between a market value (can be somewhat subjective) vs replacement cost policy pay-out too, which is why I have a personal property replacement cost policy. I also have separate riders for my photography items and some art I inherited. I researched insurance companies before purchasing my homeowners/auto coverage and on just the couple of instances I’ve used it they have been quick and easy to work with.
Just using their website for a quote veloinsurance said 700+ a year for my bikes and Markel wanted way too much personal info for me to even consider getting a quote from them. Considering I already have strong liability insurance, an excellent health care plan and don’t race so no racing accidents, for me that doesn’t make financial sense. If none of that applied and I did a lot of crazy crit races I might consider it, especially if I lived somewhere I was really worried about my expensive bikes being stolen
‘The negative feelings we all have can be addictive…just as the positive…it’s up to
us to decide which ones we want to choose and feed”… Pema Chodron