Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Which Pearl Izumis are they? The chamois in the Select ones is really bulky, and I can certainly see why people would find the Elite shorts bulky. (For me, it compressed nicely after the first few rides/washes.) I own a pair of the Pros, but I can't comment. To be honest, the more expensive the shorts, the less bulky/diaper-like the padding, for the most part, and this is pretty true among all the brands I've tried.

    I like the Pearl Izumi Elite In-R-Cool shorts (I rode a century in them with no issues), but if you already have those, that's not a helpful suggestion. You might look into the Sugoi RS shorts (again, needs to be washed a couple times, I think), Louis Garneau Neo Power, or possibly triathlon shorts.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    These reasonably priced Terry shorts work well for me on rides where I don't want a lot of padding (i.e., short rides):

    http://www.teamestrogen.com/prodTY_610016.html

    I personally like the additional padding of the Sugoi Evolution shorts on longer rides, but not everyone cares for that.
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,698
    If you like thin, try Terry's Bella shorts. They continue to be my favorites for all but the longest rides.

    IME, my best shorts have been those that felt way too bulky for the first dozen rides or so, and then compressed after riding and washing. Most shorts with a thinner chamois don't seem to "pack down" into a dense, supportive pad. Again, IME and YMMV.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Castelli's KISS-3 chamois is very nice too, though personally their shorts are not the best fit/fabric for me. +1 on the LG Neo Power. I can't stand a thick chamois.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,057
    Off the beaten track, look at Boure: http://www.boure.com/1650.html

    Triathlon shorts may be thinner, but they're also more narrow. That doesn't work for me. The Boure short has a wide, thin chamois.
    2009 Waterford RS-14 S&S Couplers - Brooks B68-Anatomica - Traveller
    2008 Waterford RS-33 - Brooks B68-Anatomica - Go Fast
    2012 Waterford Commuter - Brooks B68-Anatomica - 3.5-Season/Commuter
    2011 Surly Troll - Brooks B68 Imperial - Snow Beast

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Katy, Texas
    Posts
    1,811
    you might also want to look at aerotechdesigns.com. their standard riding shorts are quite thin and their touring shorts are only a bit thicker= I have done 60 in the thinner and 100 + at a go with the touring shorts ( added advantage, handy pockets on both sides and drawstring waists). also wild colored shorts with minimal padding if you don't mind being known as a "loud" biker."
    marni
    Katy, Texas
    Trek Madone 6.5- "Red"
    Trek Pilot 5.2- " Bebe"


    "easily outrun by a chihuahua."

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •