
Originally Posted by
OakLeaf
Well this is going to sound harsh then, but I've been the one about whom those calls were made, that resulted in a ringing phone. If someone wants to use their phone only for emergencies, I've got no problem with that. What I can't understand is why anyone would think no one else's emergencies are as important than their own.
I don't see this as harsh, but I do see it as indicative of differences in expectations due to changes in technology. Pre-cell phones, if you were home - you could be available. If you were not, you might not be reachable. Now, we expect people to carry their cell phones and answer them "in case of emergency." But sometimes that translates into 100% availability for things that aren't emergencies.
I am one of the closest people to my 89 year old grandmother (physically and emotionally). I do keep my phone with me, but I don't always answer it. I do always immediately check any voice mails that are left. There is a tension, though. My mother (and lots of other people) call my cell phone both in emergencies and "just because they want to talk." My mother in a talking mood means an hour plus on the phone listening to her yammer on. But - she tends to be the one who gets the emergency calls first (from the assisted living facility), and then relays them to me. And she doesn't like to leave voicemails. My grandmother has recovered, but when she fell a few months ago, my mother called my cell. I didn't answer and she didn't leave a message. I just happened to call her back (which is actually unusual - my normal rule is I will respond to a VM, but not a missed call). So - when she calls, how do I know if she is calling because she is "in the car and bored and wants someone to talk at" or it's an emergency? So - my question is - how do you keep the emergencies separated from the non-emergencies?
Most days in life don't stand out, But life's about those days that will...