Your wine preferences & any changes over time?

[emily_in_nc]

I used to order Chardonnay quite a lot, mainly because that was all I knew of white wines, other than Rieslings, which are too sweet for me (except for dry Rieslings). Then I tried Pinot Grigio, Pinot Gris, and Sauvignon Blanc and liked all better than Chard. Just don't care for the oak. I love dry rose as well. I don't like reds quite as well but occasionally will find one I like. Don't laugh, but I love the Bota Box "Redvolution", a boxed wine we buy at Costco. It's a blend of about five different red grapes and is slightly sweeter than most reds (for exampler, Merlot).

[OakLeaf]

Chards are generally too sweet for me, and to my taste not very food friendly, but I did have an exquisite Robert Sinskey chardonnay a couple of years back. I want to say it was an '06 or maybe even earlier, so they'd likely be past their drink-by date by now, and I have no idea about their more recent vintages. It does seem that they've upped their overall production quite a bit recently, which is probably not a good thing.

[smilingcat]

Are Chards still made with the "hint of grapefruit, citrusy fruit bouquet.. and aged in French Oak barrel..." blach! If I want the real stuff, I'll spend the money for real white Burgundy. The problem with Burgundy is that majority of the vineyards are rather small such that most labels do not produce in sufficiently large quantity. Just about every label is a rarity. Another varietal ruined alongside good zinfandel by the perceived market desire.

And I never could understand the hype about Beaujolais nouveau. Wait at the airport for the delivery from France, then have a wild party to swig that stuff down.

I'll stick to Voignier, Riesling, semillon, muscat, and few others for whites. No I'm not a wine snot. If two buck chuck is better than a Grand Cru or even a First Growth then I'll drink two buck chuck. Or something even from Gallo. Actually, Gallo being so big and with such financial clout, they can and do produce some really good wine.

The other day, I did pop a cork on a red Beaudeaux 1988. Cork was in excellent condition, wine had not oxidized, good clarity, good nose... Everyone liked it. Still have two maybe three bottles left. It actually outlasted oh never mind.

[OakLeaf]

There are plenty of unoaked chards. Oak isn't what I don't like about them.

Two buck Chuck ... to me tastes like a wine costing double. I'm no snob either, I enjoy plenty of cheap wines, but that stuff to me is just nasty.

We used to drink a fair amount of Gallo Paisano, but they must have changed the blend or something, it's not as good as it used to be.

[Bike Writer]

Are Chards still made with the "hint of grapefruit, citrusy fruit bouquet.. and aged in French Oak barrel..." blach! If I want the real stuff, I'll spend the money for real white Burgundy. The problem with Burgundy is that majority of the vineyards are rather small such that most labels do not produce in sufficiently large quantity. Just about every label is a rarity. Another varietal ruined alongside good zinfandel by the perceived market desire.

And I never could understand the hype about Beaujolais nouveau. Wait at the airport for the delivery from France, then have a wild party to swig that stuff down.

I'll stick to Voignier, Riesling, semillon, muscat, and few others for whites. No I'm not a wine snot. If two buck chuck is better than a Grand Cru or even a First Growth then I'll drink two buck chuck. Or something even from Gallo. Actually, Gallo being so big and with such financial clout, they can and do produce some really good wine.

The other day, I did pop a cork on a red Beaudeaux 1988. Cork was in excellent condition, wine had not oxidized, good clarity, good nose... Everyone liked it. Still have two maybe three bottles left. It actually outlasted oh never mind.

Oh yeah, white Burgundy, that's the real deal!