Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ventura County CA
    Posts
    605
    My blobby parts stop at my knees. Familiar with the term "cupid knees"?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235

    Long for me

    I'm a chubby 5'4" and prefer long shorts.

    * 2005 PI Ultrasensors (8.5") are currently my shorts of choice for long rides, but they need to be replaced soon. When my knee is flexed they leave about 5 inches of skin exposed above my kneecap, but at least it my thighs look ok.

    * I like a pair of Cannondale Domestique shorts that I got on sale from REI last year. For some reason they make my legs look great. They're about the same length as the Ultransensors (maybe longer) but the leg opening is pretty roomy and the leg gripper is fabric, not silicone or bare elastic. But I don't think the chamois is appropriate for very long rides.

    Come to think of it, one of my main problems with shorts is with the leg opening being too tight. I found some LG Ergo Sensors on sale here with a chamois that was surprisingly similar to the one on my PI's. But I'll have to return them because even though I bought a size larger than I normally wear, they're a bit short and the elastic at the leg is way too tight. *sigh*

    I prefer knickers because those 5 or so inches of exposed skin above my knee feel like sizzling bacon when I'm out riding for 4 hours in the hot sun. My dad had some small skin lesions on his forehead from years of playing tennis and going to the beach, so I don't want to take any chances with the sun. And of course, knickers make my legs look way better than any short can. It's obviously pretty hot most of the time here in Puerto Rico, but as long as most of my lower leg is exposed, I'm ok. Unfortunately, I still haven't found knickers that will feel comfortable after several hours on the saddle.

    * Shebeest's Pedal Pushers were great, but I had issues with the chamois.

    * Shebeest Shindiggers have a great design, but the chamois isn't for long rides. They've already survived a couple of falls, so I know the fabric is durable.

    * I ordered PI's new Sugar Knicker from TE, but the rise is so short (4" from the front edge of the chamois to the edge of the waistband) that I feel like I need a bikini wax just so I can wear them in public! The chamois looked like it could do the job, though, but since I'm not sure I want to keep them, I haven't taken them for a ride.

    * Got a deal on some Castelli Zen 2 knickers and they fit well, but the chamois was a lot thinner than I expected, and the fabric looks a bit delicate.

    So if any of you gals have some suggestions for nicely padded knickers, bibs, or long-ish shorts with ample leg openings (and with enough of a rise to cover my navel), please let me know.

    Oh, and sorry for the long post. I take my shorts seriously.

    ~ Cari
    Last edited by Cari; 04-12-2006 at 10:59 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Cari
    * I ordered PI's new Sugar Knicker from TE, but the rise is so short (4" from the front edge of the chamois to the edge of the waistband) that I feel like I need a bikini wax just so I can wear them in public!
    I just tried these on and bought some at my LBS. I felt rather unsure about the very low rise in front, but then I decided to try cinching the drawstring a little bit. I've never ever used the drawstring on shorts or tights in the past. In fact I always wondered why they even have drawstrings! Anyway, with a lightly tightened drawstring the Sugar knickers are better. They are still awfully low rise when standing up straight (and me, with a potbelly!) but cinched, with a longer jersey and bent over on a bike they're great. I have a very sensitive stomach and I frequently get digestive complaints if something is too tight on my waist.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    1,852
    if the chamois on the sugar knickers is the same as the chamois on the sugar shorts.. i HATE that chamois! IMHO... i might as well not even wear a chamois it's THAT thin! (for comparison..... i LOVE the chamois in performance ultra shorts)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ventura County CA
    Posts
    605
    I guess everyone is different. I have the sugar knickers and the rise hits me an inch below my naval. I think the chamois is on the huge size but its comfortable. Heh - diaper butt - heh heh.

    Anyone wear the InSport Stamina Cycle Short? I love the red panel down the side -- slimming. Is it a mid rise short? Th chamois looks very interesting with special WSD cutouts for the naughty bits...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387

    2006 Sugar Knickers

    It's the new "Touring Chamois" (I was hoping to get a pair of 2005's with the 3D Race chamois but can't locate them) which is some powder blue XL soft dealy. Not my thing.

    Nanci
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,253
    Yeah, the Sugar Knickers I just bought are the 2006 ones with the beefy chamois.


    Somehow the term "beefy chamois" sounds so wrong, but I'm leaving it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387

    Dianyla

    You know before "real" chamois were invented, riders in Tour de France used to sit on raw beef steaks, right?

    I wouldn't call that beefy, I'd call it foamy but soft.

    Nanci
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Central Florida
    Posts
    3,387

    Googled

    "Before shorts had chamois inserts, the early riders of the Tour de France improvised. Legend has it that they would buy a cheap cut of steak from a local butcher in the morning. Ready for the off, they'd stick the slab of beef down their shorts and sit on it like a cushion. They'd ride like that all day -- tenderising the meat with their motion, marinading it in their sweat -- then hand it to the hotel chef in the evening with the instruction that it needed only a minute on each side."
    ***********
    "...I'm like the cycling version of the guy in Flowers for Algernon." Mike Magnuson

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    3,099
    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll alrighty then! I'm a-thinking that may qualify as TMI! ROFL


    as for shorts: I wear longer shorts in the winter coz I Hate that gap between my leg warmers and the bottom of my shorts. I wear short shorts in the summer coz I'm short and short shorts seems to hit me right about wear long shorts hit taller ppl!

    As for shorts: I have the Performance Century Shorts and the Century Gel Short Shorts and love them both.
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, champagne in one hand, strawberries in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming: "Yeah Baby! What a Ride!"

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •