Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    You could also consider going up a size in the Lush if the Fuel doesn't work. The standover on the 16.5" Lush is still less than the 15.5" inch Fuel according to Trek's website.

    Also, I think I misspoke before. When I looked at Trek's website, I saw the Lush 29er SL and missed the fact that the Lush SL also comes in a 26er. My reference to 110 mm of travel was to the 29er, not the 26er. It looks like the Lush SL 26er comes with 120 mm of travel. '

    But now that I'm comparing the right bikes, I have to wonder if you'll feel any less cramped on the 15.5" Fuel. The effective TT isn't that much longer than the Lush.
    Last edited by indysteel; 04-16-2013 at 06:36 AM.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •