Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407

    Tubeless set up for MTB racing...

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I'm looking for opinions about tubeless set-ups...

    My concerns are primarily weight and not flatting. Does anyone in here run straight tubeless? If so, do you add a sealant and is it worth the extra weight? Do you ever ride below 40psi and have any problems?

    Or...

    Is there anyone who runs a standard tire with Stan's conversion kit (because its lighter than tubeless)? If you use this set up how often do you have to clean your tire out and refill?


    I might try to run Kenda Karma UST's and perhaps carry Innovations "seal and flate". I pretty much don't want to run tubes...
    Last edited by madisongrrl; 04-03-2006 at 08:23 AM.
    Just keep pedaling.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    373
    The SO rides tubeless tyres and uses a sealant in them, it works reasonably well but it is not foolproof. He does ride them at a lower pressure than a normal tyre set up, he is about 14 stone (quick maths: 196 pounds) and I think he runs them about the 40/45psi mark. Making the probably fairly accurate assumption that you are significantly lighter than this then I would have thought you should have no problems riding lower than 40 psi if you want to. I run a normal tubed tyre set up and run my front tyre, Panaracer Fire XC Pros at 30 psi with no problems (I'm about 140 pounds).

    The So uses them as a general tail tyre rather than a race tyre however he has single handedly put everyone in our riding group off using tubeless tyres, ever. He probably doesn't really get any more flats than before but the hassle of fixing them in the wilds when the sealant doesn't quite work is magnified (very messy and they can be a b*gger to seat on the rims) and they are usually fixed by putting a tube in them anyway. I'm not convinced they are a great idea for long rides (especially anywhere near thorns). As for racing, I have a feeling that they are best used here but I have no direct experience of them in that context.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    719

    i don't have them but..

    I know several of my friends do, and one ping of a rock on the rim, some damage and - a flat and putting in a regular tube anyway. many of them think that it isn't worth the extra cash to get tubeless with mtb.
    "The greater the obstacle, the more glory in overcoming it."-Moliere

    "Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time." -Thomas A. Edison



    Shorty's Adventure - Blog

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by han-grrl
    I know several of my friends do, and one ping of a rock on the rim, some damage and - a flat and putting in a regular tube anyway. many of them think that it isn't worth the extra cash to get tubeless with mtb.
    Were they running a psi below 40 and how much do they weigh?
    Just keep pedaling.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,080

    I run tubeless

    I've been running tubeless this season. I've got a set of Mavic Crossmax (super-light) and run Kenda tires. For my races at Ft. Ord (hard-packed fast courses) I run super-narrow low-profile tires (like the Klimax Lite) with higher pressure. For Sea Otter yesterday (lots of mud and sand), I ran the Kharisma with about 35psi in the front and 40psi in the back. I weighed 159 yesterday morning. I don't run any sealant.

    Knock on wood, I've never gotten a flat on my mtb.

    My only negative comment is that I find it more difficult to mount & dismount tubeless tires than a standard clincher, but that's the nature of having a tight seal on the tires/rims.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by velogirl
    I've been running tubeless this season. I've got a set of Mavic Crossmax (super-light) and run Kenda tires. For my races at Ft. Ord (hard-packed fast courses) I run super-narrow low-profile tires (like the Klimax Lite) with higher pressure. For Sea Otter yesterday (lots of mud and sand), I ran the Kharisma with about 35psi in the front and 40psi in the back. I weighed 159 yesterday morning. I don't run any sealant.

    Knock on wood, I've never gotten a flat on my mtb.

    My only negative comment is that I find it more difficult to mount & dismount tubeless tires than a standard clincher, but that's the nature of having a tight seal on the tires/rims.
    Thank you for this....this was exactly what I was looking for. Mavic Crossmax makes for a nice set up. My brother runs Crossmaxes and they are indeed super light. I unfortunately have Bontrager Race Discs which are not quite as light. Maybe I'll spring for a new wheel set next year.
    Last edited by madisongrrl; 04-11-2006 at 11:21 AM.
    Just keep pedaling.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    719

    tubeless

    no and probably about 160-170 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by madisongrrl
    Were they running a psi below 40 and how much do they weigh?
    "The greater the obstacle, the more glory in overcoming it."-Moliere

    "Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time." -Thomas A. Edison



    Shorty's Adventure - Blog

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •