USA-made road bike for under $2K?

[goldfinch]

Rodriguez bikes are made in the US and they have a model that is about $2000. http://www.rodbikes.com/

[LanterneRouge]

Any thoughts on steel vs. aluminum vs. carbon?

[Owlie]

For your budget, I'd go steel. You're more likely to be able to get that than carbon, and the ride on steel is more comfy.

[Catrin]

Steel, hands down

[eofelis]

Steel, hands down

I did a road ride today on my custom (someone else's custom, I got it second hand) steel Gunnar Sport and omg it's a dreamy smooth riding bike. (I hadn't been on that bike since last fall.)

[Trek420]

Rodriguez bikes are made in the US and they have a model that is about $2000. http://www.rodbikes.com/

Rodriguez are great, Davidson too. Here's another far from exhaustive list i blugged on my blog: http://madeinusareviews.blogspot.com...-bicycles.html

Thank you TE for helping me keep it semi current.

[LanterneRouge]

Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions.

Thanks for the list Trek420--that will be a good starting point for me.

So, what's the deal with steel? Does it absorb shock better? I have been riding for over 3 years now, but I'm not a bike expert. I just get on my bike and ride. Steel is heavier than aluminum, so, does that affect performance at all? There seems to be so much emphasis on bikes being lightweight.

Muirenn- I'm on the Left Coast, in So Cal. But if you know anyone in my area that is looking to sell a used or past-model USA-made bike, I'm interested. I'm 5'7. I haven't measured my leg length in a while, so I forgot what it is. My hybrid is a 17" and the last time I tried to get fitted for a Trek road bike I *think* I was a 50 or 51 cm.

[Owlie]

My steel CX bike (stock) is about 22.75 pounds without water bottle cages or pedals (but with wheels, disc brakes, etc). That's pretty light for a stock steel frame. Custom gets lighter. I think Catrin's custom steel bike is about the same as my aluminum road bike. Yes, my cross bike is a little slower than my road bike, but I think that's down to the bigger, lower-pressure tires and the gearing (it's geared quite low), not the frame material.

Aluminum is light, inexpensive and stiff. It doesn't flex, so if you go over a bump or a rough road surface (chip seal, for example), it transfers all those vibrations to you. Steel flexes a little, and that flex helps absorb vibration.

If you want used, you might have some luck finding an old Cannondale. I think up until 2009 they were making their aluminum bikes in the United States. More aggressive aluminum frames don't seem to have the vibration issues that the relaxed ones do. The boyfriend has an R2000 from 2004 (it says "Handmade in the USA" in HUGE letters on the chainstay), and doesn't have any problems with road buzz.

[indysteel]

To the OP, is your $2k budget for the frameset (frame plus fork) or for a complete bike?

[LanterneRouge]

To the OP, is your $2k budget for the frameset (frame plus fork) or for a complete bike?

Well, I was hoping to stick to under $2,000 for the entire bike. But, I can talk myself into spending more if I feel like I have to. I rationalize it like this: if my husband can buy a TV for $3,000 because he loves watching sports on a giant screen, then I think I think there is a dollar-for-dollar justification on my bike, out of which I'll get similar use and enjoyment. Now, if you add in the cost of the speakers and subwoofer, then I'm looking at an amazing bike. This seems like a rational argument to me. Am I wrong?

[emily_in_nc]

And obviously if you're willing to go with a used bike, you can buy a lotta bike for $2K. I recently got a Trek Pilot 5.0 full carbon w/Ultegra for $700 on ebay, but it is a 2006 model. I agree, steel is preferable to aluminum unless you're looking to race. It's much more comfy for endurance/fitness type riding.

Good luck!

[indysteel]

Well, I was hoping to stick to under $2,000 for the entire bike. But, I can talk myself into spending more if I feel like I have to. I rationalize it like this: if my husband can buy a TV for $3,000 because he loves watching sports on a giant screen, then I think I think there is a dollar-for-dollar justification on my bike, out of which I'll get similar use and enjoyment. Now, if you add in the cost of the speakers and subwoofer, then I'm looking at an amazing bike. This seems like a rational argument to me. Am I wrong?

My husband and I each have five or me bikes. So, no, I don't think you're wrong. But don't spend $3k or more unless it really buys you want you want. I, personally, would go with custom steel from any number of builders, but I'd want to build it up with decent components and good wheels--and that really adds up.

Somebody mentioned Davidson. A woman on another forum just had one made and really enjoyed the process. It's a gorgeous bike.

[Owlie]

Steel is much smoother than aluminum or carbon. Or can be at its best. Not all steel is equal.

Nor is all carbon. An endurance-oriented carbon bike is probably going to be a smoother ride than a speed-oriented one. Add to that the fact there are differences in carbon lay-up between different grades of frame within the same line...

[java]

Rodriguez bikes are made in the US and they have a model that is about $2000. http://www.rodbikes.com/

I love my Rodriguez Rainier. I use it for commuting and organized rides. The steel and a custom fit made all the difference for me.

[LanterneRouge]

Does anyone have (or know someone who has) a Seven bike? I ordered their catalog and I am really liking this company's outlook on biking, business, and life in general. Their emphases on building a quality bike AND taking care of their employees were refreshing to read about.

Has anyone heard any friends' testimonials on whether they're happy with their Seven? Their bikes are all out of my budget, but I might be open to expanding my budget or possibly buying one used. All of their bikes are custom, so I'd still have the issue of ordering a bike without ever having test-ridden it.