Up until my ankle fracture last year, I had never been hospitalized, had never had surgery, and was very distrustful of conventional medicine. I was horrified by the idea of having a foreign material surgically implanted in my body. The horror stories on the internet about hardware contributing to a catastrophic break in the future didn't help. All this contributed to an agonizing decision to have my ankle surgically repaired.
Over a year later, I feel that I made the right decision to have surgery on my ankle. It sped my healing and gave me the best chance of regaining as much ankle function as possible. I am still very distrustful of conventional medicine but I think that orthopedics is one area in which conventional medicine excels.
With that being said, I have decided to have my hardware removed now that my ankle is fully healed. This was also a difficult decision but I feel that the relatively small risks posed by this second surgery are outweighed by the additional function that I'll gain after the hardware is removed.
This post is not intended to influence your decision one way or the other. I simply wanted to point out that many of us have had a good experience with surgical repair of broken bones, (even someone who still doesn't trust most conventional medicine). Don't let the internet horror stories unduly influence your decision. Even if you opt for hardware, you won't necessarily be stuck with it forever.



). Don't let the internet horror stories unduly influence your decision. Even if you opt for hardware, you won't necessarily be stuck with it forever.
Reply With Quote
Let your husband fix you some hot cocoa, you need it.
