
Originally Posted by
ZenBiker
Devold, it's a 50 so it has the 26" wheels. The 52 would probably fit me better, at least according to the Salsa website, and my only lingering doubt/regret is that I didn't hold out for a chance to ride a 52 and compare. But the closest bike shop that even carries Surly and Salsa is a 3-hour drive for me, and I was only in town for the day, and the 50 felt pretty good...and anyway, as you said, the 52 has 26" wheels too.
So far I don't feel like I gave up much by having smaller wheels. There is less toe overlap than with my 700c road bike and while the Salsa isn't a speed machine, i can maintain a respectable pace very easily once I get going.
Edited to add: the guy at the shop showed me an article by Rivendell that gave a bunch of reasons they will only use 26" wheels on smaller frames - had to do with seat tube angles and other things they considered unacceptable geometry compromises when putting bigger wheels on such frames. I don't have the knowledge or experience to critically evaluate the things they said, but it sounded pretty convincing.
Thanks, it sounds promising
I also read some stuff about why they chose smaller wheels. The 50 and 52 are SMALL frames and I hate to much toe overlap!
I hope you'll enjoy your new bike :-)
2010 Rock Lobster - mtb converted to commuter bike
2010 Kona Dr. Lisa - commuter
2011 Titus Rockstar 29er - Full suspension