Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 34

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    23

    I'm new to this, too, but I second smallest feasible size

    I recently bought my first mountain bike, and although nothing is actually uncomfortable, I am beginning to worry that I should have purchased the smaller size. In particular, if you are new to mountain biking, your roadie instincts about proper fit may be very misleading.

    I am 5'7 with a ~31.5"-32" inseam (long legs, short torso). The two LBS guys helping me with my purchase disagreed about whether I was a better fit for a 15" or a 17". I went with a 17" WSD Rockhopper, which actually has the reach of the 15" men's model, but the height of a 17" model. At the time I purchased it, I thought the reach was very close (almost too close) and my greater concern was that I might be buying a bike that was too small. (My understanding is that Rockhoppers are known as relatively short reach bikes, in contrast to Gary Fisher and others known for their longer reach). I have 3" of standover clearance and 6.5" of visible seatpost. I am not uncomfortable in any way, but I do have this nagging suspicion that the 15" would be more chuckable and nimble, as others have aptly put it.

    PS: I have most often read 3"-6" of standover clearance is ideal, with standover measured by standing astride the bike, lifting it by the seat and bars, and assessing how far from the ground the wheels are.
    Last edited by VW Beetle; 03-24-2006 at 03:04 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    18
    Ok, now I am curious. I am 5'11" with an inseam of 36. What size am I looking at?

    I sat on a Trek 820 last night and liked it. No pink or yellow ones though!
    My Biking Blog

    Fat bottomed girls they'll be riding today
    So look out for those beauties oh yeah
    -Queen



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta
    Ok, now I am curious. I am 5'11" with an inseam of 36. What size am I looking at?

    I sat on a Trek 820 last night and liked it. No pink or yellow ones though!
    It looks like the Trek 820 comes in a variety of sizes (you can check the website). Just find the hardtail mountain bike section. The 820 will be under the steel frame section. Then click on the geometry headline on top of the picture of the bike. The sizes range from 13-24" and the standover heights range from 23.5 to a whopping 34.3"
    Just keep pedaling.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    18
    Thanks for the information Madisongrrl. I'll look it up.
    My Biking Blog

    Fat bottomed girls they'll be riding today
    So look out for those beauties oh yeah
    -Queen



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    70
    Measure yourselves up on the following site and see what they say for a bike fit:

    www.wrenchscience.com

    This system takes into consideration most of the important measurements in a bike fitting, and I think it will give you a good indication of what size bike you should be riding.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    488
    OK, I have done all the measurements and I really think I should be riding a smaller bike than I was originally fitted( is that a word?) on. I have enlisted the help of a local ironwoman/extrerra triathlete to come to the bike shop with me. Maybe two women telling them the bike is too bike will make them pay attention. Thanks again for all the help. Jones.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by Jones
    OK, I have done all the measurements and I really think I should be riding a smaller bike than I was originally fitted( is that a word?) on. I have enlisted the help of a local ironwoman/extrerra triathlete to come to the bike shop with me. Maybe two women telling them the bike is too bike will make them pay attention. Thanks again for all the help. Jones.

    Good for you. Don't let those bike shop men push you around!
    Just keep pedaling.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by VW Beetle
    I recently bought my first mountain bike, and although nothing is actually uncomfortable, I am beginning to worry that I should have purchased the smaller size. In particular, if you are new to mountain biking, your roadie instincts about proper fit may be very misleading.

    I am 5'7 with a ~31.5"-32" inseam (long legs, short torso). The two LBS guys helping me with my purchase disagreed about whether I was a better fit for a 15" or a 17". I went with a 17" WSD Rockhopper, which actually has the reach of the 15" men's model, but the height of a 17" model. At the time I purchased it, I thought the reach was very close (almost too close) and my greater concern was that I might be buying a bike that was too small. (My understanding is that Rockhoppers are known as relatively short reach bikes, in contrast to Gary Fisher and others known for their longer reach). I have 3" of standover clearance and 6.5" of visible seatpost. I am not uncomfortable in any way, but I do have this nagging suspicion that the 15" would be more chuckable and nimble, as others have aptly put it.

    PS: I have most often read 3"-6" of standover clearance is ideal, with standover measured by standing astride the bike, lifting it by the seat and bars, and assessing how far from the ground the wheels are.
    Sometimes you have to ride the bike awhile to get comfortable on it. You can also change out the stem length (shorten it) and pull the reach closer. I ride the 17" men's Spec. Stump and it fits me fine. I even have fairly short arms and I'm OK. I can't recall if I change out the stem. I might have. The 17 WSD s/b OK. If not, take it back to the shop and ask them to help you adjust the fit.

    Now strangely my Fisher has a shorter reach but it is a slightly smaller bike (16.5") so maybe that's why.
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •