Hah. And on the opposite end of the spectrum, Patagonia declares that their "long" length is only 33. Which is barely long enough for me (provided they don't shrink at all). My mom and her sisters all need about a 35-inch inseam!
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 15 of 52
Thread: women's pants rant
Hybrid View
-
03-25-2012, 04:04 PM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 1,942
"I never met a donut I didn't like" - Dave Wiens
-
03-25-2012, 04:08 PM #2
Dodging the potholes...
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Southern Maine
- Posts
- 1,668
That's worse...at least with too long one can shorten them, you can't lengthen pants that are too short! I think there just need to be more lengths offered to fit the range of people's heights.
Originally Posted by jessmarimba
2011 Surly LHT
1995 Trek 830
Reply With Quote