Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    around Seattle, WA
    Posts
    3,238
    One thing to possibly consider is the Environmental Justice law (executive order). This may be a way to help fight it, or at least enforce environmental compliance. Don't count on a state regulatory agency - the state will want their cut of the royalties (states like more $$ for state coffers).
    Beth

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    around Seattle, WA
    Posts
    3,238
    Quote Originally Posted by Muirenn View Post
    Look into NEPA, the National Environmental Protection Act.
    \
    Slight correction: NEPA - National Environmental Policy Act

    Just so every one knows - NEPA regards disclosure of proposed Federal action - how and why federal funds are spent for projects or programs, addressing something like 40+ federal laws and executive orders. So there can be impacts or effects of the project - you just have to disclose them. The project can avoid, minimize, or mitigate effects.

    NEPA doesn't stop actions from happening. That's where the 40+ laws and executive orders come in, and how the enforcement branch of the appropriate agency chooses to weigh in. If you want more, here's the government web page:
    http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/

    (I write NEPA documents for a living.)

    One other thought - obviously (?) this in reference to federal actions in the United States. Other countries have their own, or not, laws, regs, and ways to document effects on the environment.
    Last edited by bmccasland; 02-16-2012 at 01:12 PM. Reason: another stray thought
    Beth

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •