I would've figured it out if I'd bothered to click through.
Yikes. Three (or fewer) 100-g samples to publish these figures that people rely on??? I guess that gives you an idea how seriously they take nutrition.
And a lot of the nutritional values they give are based on zero data points, estimated from "another form of the same food, or similar food." Including the figures for dehydrated apricots, except for vitamin C and the B-complex which are likely to be further degraded by the extra processing. Which still doesn't explain the variation in iron between dehydrated apricots and the other forms. 
It's worth noting that for dried apricots, they had three data points, a mean iron content per 100 g of 2.66 g and a standard deviation of 0.624.
Last edited by OakLeaf; 10-25-2011 at 05:16 AM.
Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler