
Originally Posted by
shootingstar
It seems to me, that several of my recent posts are being misinterpreted(?).
I was quoting from a news article that someone else wrote...which was cautionary. Of course, the journalist wrote in an eye-catching way to grab the reader.
What did I do wrong now?

I know from having met you that you are person with good intentions, but merely quoting an article and then listing a few of your own experiences in this case falls short of providing the context which indicates why you are starting a discussion on this topic. Usually I've seen you end your introductory posts with some kind of personal observation or a question for the forum, but not this time. So it leaves one to wonder.
I've been there, NBYNW...unemployed for 18 months.
Yes, employers get curious if one is merely unemployed at mid-life.
I can see this logic in "normal" times, but it makes no sense to hold it over now. This is the worst economy in decades. IMO employers are really limiting their options by automatically not considering the long-term unemployed when they are looking to fill a role. Sure there may be some oddballs out there, but I think it's cruel to laugh at them so why even bring it up. At the same time, there are a lot of good people who have been out of work for a very long time, and it's a stupid reason not to give someone a second look.
2014 Bobbin Bramble / Brooks B67
2008 Rodriguez Rainier Mirage / Terry Butterfly Tri Gel
2007 Dahon Speed Pro TT / Biologic Velvet