I tried the Amira again today, (in 48 and 51) and the my LBS guys took a lot of time to make some adjustments to get me in a more aggressive position. Overall it felt really good, and I would even get the 2011 model 300-400 bucks cheaper. But, why does it have to be BLUE?? I am not a blue person, whatsoever... I know it's really bad to choose (or not choose) a bike based on its color, but if I spend so much money on a new bike, I really want to look at it and start drooling
They were kind enough to order me the 49 Tarmac, and that is one sexy looking bike!! (black with red) It's the 2011 model, and I would get it cheaper as well... Since my torso is "longer", it might actually fit better, with less adjustments, than the Amira. It's gonna be in next week.
The only thing that worries me is that the seat tube length will be 1cm longer on the Tarmac, and the saddle is already pretty far down on the Amira...

If the Tarmac won't work, I will most likely go ahead and order a 2012 Amira. It still has blue in it, but the majority of the bike is carbon black with some white... It's gonna be worth it to me to pay 300 bucks extra to avoid a completely blue bike.