Training for Century

[Catrin]

Most important of all, listen to your body! Personally I do not understand it when I see advice that 60-70 miles is "close enough" to a full century. There is a world of difference between 60 miles and 100! Last summer I had no problems with metric centuries, but 75 miles was a quite different story. I injured myself before I reached my goal, and that was due to not listening to my body - or understanding what it was trying to tell me.

Plans are good, and the goal of 10% mileage increase per week works well - but it is important to remember the body does reach plateaus when building a strong mileage base. Really listen to your body, rest days are as much a part of training as active riding is. I learned the hard way that the body couldn't care less about that training chart we have so carefully worked out if it doesn't get the right amount of rest, nutrition, and hydration.

You will find your nutrition requirements changing as you ride longer/further, it is a good idea to take more food with you than you think you will need. You won't regret it either way

For long rides I do not take pure water with me, unless I think I might need something to pour over my head to cool me down if riding in the heat of the day. For long rides I have a hydration pack full of Hammer Heed, and a water bottle of Accelerade. For rides <45 miles I will generally just have water with me and Shot Blocks unless it is VERY hot, then I might put Heed in my hydration pack, it depends on where I am riding.

I hope at least some of this is helpful, take what you need and leave the rest

[skywalkerbeth]

Hi everyone

Thank you for the great input. It's so funny the difference advice I am getting on a mostly male (non cycling) forum. I told some male friends on this forum about my bike (knowing that many cycle) and about the planned century. Last night one of them told me "if you can do 30 you can do a century" and another said "four hours training ride, tops, is enough". I bet he's faster than I am. 4 hours would be 50 miles for me assuming I can keep my current pace. I am not convinced I will become faster as a result of this training - just more endurance.

The thing I have to remember is that I am 45 and while I used to be in great shape, and have tried to at least keep a minimum fitness level, I AM a middle aged sedentary office worker (attorney). I'm on my *** at work constantly and the past few years I've gotten incrementally worse and worse at keeping up with fitness. The call of the couch and a glass of wine is strong after a day at work (why the couch I cannot say). I am trying to reverse what is becoming a long standing trend before it's too late.

My last ride, two weeks ago (too hot otherwise) was 22 miles and I felt like a million bucks afterwards and felt I could go on and on. Y'day was 30. I felt mostly good, but definite knee pain in my right knee and my back was stiff later in the day. Also my neck hurt somewhat. That's only an 8 mile increase. On the other hand, two full weeks of nothing.

Re: nutrition. I am SO bad about food. Again, lazy habits. No doubt I should be on a special diet, or at least pay attention. I will be scouring the board for tips there.

[Crankin]

I did a flat century, but with vicious headwinds, with no training other than my usual hilly riding, with rides up to 65 miles or so.
Would I do it again? Maybe. I might want to do a 75 miler or 80 miler, before, but I don't think that would take away the mental pain of miles 85-100. Most of it is in your head and good nutrition/hydration. I'm just really adverse to "training." I knew in my head I could do it, and I set a realistic time goal, which I beat by a half hour. I did not ride fast, with 6.5 hours of riding time.
I had been riding for awhile when I did this, so SkyWalker is in a different position. But, it seems like maybe you need to do *more* riding, not necessarily longer. There's a huge difference between 30 and 100 miles. The year I did the century, I rode 3,000 miles, but a lot of those miles were little 15 mile rides I could squeeze in before or after work. I always ride both days on the weekends, usually one long ride and one of 15-25 miles. I take Mondays off and another day during the week. Mostly, those are active rest days, doing yoga or walking/hiking.
Everyone's different, but I would start riding more if I was in your position, while at the same time, slowly increasing your long ride of the week.

[blue_angel]

Here is a thumbnail sketch of Selene Yeager's training plan. It's actually less aggressive than the one in her book, as that one has you riding a minimum of 5 days a week and preferably 6.

Given what you've said above, I think you would really need to have at least one training ride of 85 miles under your belt before the century (especially if your pace is really 4 hours/50 miles. You need to acclimate to the saddle time, as well as acclimating to the effort. The only real way to make up for volume (number of miles) is to increase intensity significantly. This is the basis of Chris Carmichael's "The Time Crunched Athlete" program: using high intensity intervals, he gets his clients into competitive race shape with a maximum of 8 riding hours per week. I know you're not racing, but the principle still holds. If you can do 40 miles at a pace that sends you into your 80-85% max HR zone, then you can probably do double that mileage at a lower intensity on century day.

Race day nutrition is a different concern that day-to-day nutrition. I really recommend that you get yourself a copy of "Everywoman's Guide to Cycling." It goes through all of these things, and is for the most part a very good resource.