Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Lexa vs. Madone

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,632
    Don't blame you. My frain is occasionally bried with this sort of weather.

    Anyway, OP. I agree with the statement that if you've got the money, go for carbon--even if that means taking a hit on the components. Those are relatively easy to upgrade.
    At least I don't leave slime trails.
    http://wholecog.wordpress.com/

    2009 Giant Avail 3 |Specialized Jett 143

    2013 Charge Filter Apex| Specialized Jett 143
    1996(?) Giant Iguana 630|Specialized Riva


    Saving for the next one...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    16
    Thanks for all of the commentary! I was hoping that there wouldn't be a noticeable difference between the aluminum frame with carbon fork and full carbon bike, so that I could save the sizeable difference in cost, but it sounds like the carbon frame is worth the high price. I'm not sure I'm ready to spend the $2,000+ on a carbon frame (I was hoping to spend somewhere in the range of $1,000-$1,500). To save up, I may end up waiting longer than planned before I make the leap.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,897
    Comparing the Madone 3.1 WSD and the Lexa SLX, the main differences are:

    - frame material (carbon vs aluminum)
    - Madone comes with a compact double chain ring, Lexa comesw with a triple
    - Lexa frame comes in a 43, if you need that size

    The specific gearing is:
    Madone: SRAM Apex, 50/34 (compact) vs Lexa: Shimano R-553, 50/39/30 (triple)

    Both have the same cassette: Shimano 105 11-28, 10 speed

    So I think the Lexa would give you some lower gears for climbing. However it's possible that the lowest gear on the Madone would be sufficient; I'm okay with lowest gear on my bike, which has a compact double, and I ride up a fair number of steep hills (with asthma).

    The wheels are also different, though I don't know much about wheels so I can't say if those on the Madone are a significant improvement or not.

    Madone: Alloy hubs, Bontrager Approved alloy rims
    Lexa: Bontrager SSR (43cm: 650c)

    So I would say the Lexa SLX looks like a very good road bike for your purposes, but if you think could afford the Madone, I would give that a test ride also to see how the carbon frame feels. Also test ride on a hill to compare the gears, if you can.
    Last edited by ny biker; 07-18-2011 at 01:51 PM.

    - Gray 2010 carbon WSD road bike, Rivet Independence saddle
    - Red hardtail 26" aluminum mountain bike, Bontrager Evoke WSD saddle
    - Royal blue 2018 aluminum gravel bike, Rivet Pearl saddle

    Gone but not forgotten:
    - Silver 2003 aluminum road bike
    - Two awesome worn out Juliana saddles

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    32
    I can't speak for the Madone but I have a Lexa SLX (the top Lexa model) and I love it. I used to have a full carbon bike before I bought this one and I honestly can't feel a difference at all. If you can swing the money for the Madone then go ahead and get but don't feel like you are getting a bad bike if you get the Lexa. Also, not all the Lexas are triples; mine isn't.
    "What am I on? I'm on my bike, busting my *** 6 hours a day. What are you on?" Lance Armstrong

    2011 Quintana Roo Dulce
    2011 Trek Lexa SLX

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •