Compact or Triple Crank?

[limewave]

After reading everyone's responses, I'm pretty excited to try the 2x10.

[Reesha]

I would think switching from little ring to big ring and back and forth would be a fairly big jump. Potential for cross chaining? I don't know. I like the smoother shifting of my triple...

[Aggie_Ama]

The large ring on the 2x10 is not usually as big as the large ring on a triple so it would be more like shifting little to middle. The little ring I think is a little bit bigger. But if you play around with a gear ration chart you will find a lot of combinations in a triple are duplicates. I believe the bottom line is with a double you lose your biggest gear (hardest effort in big ring) and maybe your absolute granny.

Not for everyone but I think you may like it Limewave since you are a racer and have said you liked the more aggressive bikes anyway. Have fun!

[tzvia]

There is so much overlap in gears that you only loose a couple of the highest gears if your 44 gear fell off and left you with 32/22. No biggie. 2x10? If you already have a 3x9, you don't have to go the full 2x10 route (cogset, shifters, crankset), you can do a 2x9. I did so on both my MTBs, by removing the 32 and 44, and putting a 36 on the middle position. I then chose to put a bash guard on in place of the 44 but that's optional. I still have all my low gears, and lost the highest gear (which I can't remember ever using). I then adjusted the front derailleur stop to prevent it from going far enough to throw the chain to the now missing 44 chainring. Tada! 2x9 for a little elbow grease to remove the crankset and remove chainrings, a bashguard and chainring.

So now I am either climbing or I am not, just two choices up front. The chainline is improved, there is less slack chain in the lower gears as I removed two links (no longer need to wrap around a 44 ring) and there is a bashguard protecting my calves from being sliced open by a spining chainring in a wreck. I've been riding this way since about this time last year and I will never go back to a triple.

[Becky]

There is so much overlap in gears that you only loose a couple of the highest gears if your 44 gear fell off and left you with 32/22. No biggie. 2x10? If you already have a 3x9, you don't have to go the full 2x10 route (cogset, shifters, crankset), you can do a 2x9. I did so on both my MTBs, by removing the 32 and 44, and putting a 36 on the middle position. I then chose to put a bash guard on in place of the 44 but that's optional. I still have all my low gears, and lost the highest gear (which I can't remember ever using). I then adjusted the front derailleur stop to prevent it from going far enough to throw the chain to the now missing 44 chainring. Tada! 2x9 for a little elbow grease to remove the crankset and remove chainrings, a bashguard and chainring.

So now I am either climbing or I am not, just two choices up front. The chainline is improved, there is less slack chain in the lower gears as I removed two links (no longer need to wrap around a 44 ring) and there is a bashguard protecting my calves from being sliced open by a spining chainring in a wreck. I've been riding this way since about this time last year and I will never go back to a triple.

This is exactly what I'm thinking about doing, but I'm still debating 34 vs. 36 for the "big" ring. I wonder if shortening the chain as you describe would help with my funky shifting in the 22.....you've given me hope, Tzvia!