Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 54

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Portland Metro Area
    Posts
    859
    To original poster: Why do you want this information? Training purposes? To gauge how much to eat? Just for kicks? Numbers nerd? I'm curious.

    I use a Polar FT40 to see my calorie burn for every activity (fitness) I do. I don't eat more or less based on calorie burn. For me it just ensures that I get consistent calorie burn each week for fitness.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Socal
    Posts
    130
    Linda,

    It appears that your zones are off on the Garmin and is as you are always riding zone 1. As OakLeaf sudjested measure your pulse at the top of that hill and compare the 2 if they agree set your zones and MHR to that number.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    1,222
    Quote Originally Posted by bellissima View Post
    Linda,

    It appears that your zones are off on the Garmin and is as you are always riding zone 1. As OakLeaf sudjested measure your pulse at the top of that hill and compare the 2 if they agree set your zones and MHR to that number.
    Yes, it does appear that I never seem to get out of Zone 1, but for a few exceptions.

    I am a little confused regarding your suggestions. So are you saying that I should lower my MHR to what it is after I climb a steep hill...instead of setting it at 176 (220 - 44)? If I got that right, then my MHR would end up being like 135...which seems awfully low. Can you explain a bit more?

    Linda
    2012 Seven Axiom SL - Specialized Ruby SL 155

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Socal
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by nscrbug View Post
    Yes, it does appear that I never seem to get out of Zone 1, but for a few exceptions.

    I am a little confused regarding your suggestions. So are you saying that I should lower my MHR to what it is after I climb a steep hill...instead of setting it at 176 (220 - 44)? If I got that right, then my MHR would end up being like 135...which seems awfully low. Can you explain a bit more?

    Linda
    Linda, the 220-age doesn't work with everybody and it is meat to be a starting point. As an example I am 35 and my actual MHR is 195 and I've seen higher. if I use the formula 22-35 my MHR would be 185 and that is over 10 counts off on the other hand my friend is 42, his MHR from recorded races is 193, if we use 220-42= 178 also that is 15 counts off. At this point I would suggest to set your MHR at 135 and see if you get more realistic numbers. Also do another effort on that hill and try to measure your pulse to see if it is in line with your Garmin reading.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Little Egypt
    Posts
    1,867
    Linda, based on both our experiences with this, I'm going to do some research on the Garmin site and let you know what I find out.

    We did the 15 mile TT course last night with some grueling hills. My time was 50 minutes with a 17.1 average. I did not wear my hrm and the Garmin said I burned 759 calories. Just for comparison I went to caloriesperhour.com and put the info in and it said I should've burned 690 which is pretty close. Had I worn the hrm, it probably would've said 350!
    __________________
    "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing." George Bernard Shaw

    Luna Eclipse/Selle Italia Lady
    Surly Pacer/Terry Butterfly
    Quintana Roo Cd01/Koobi Stratus
    1981 Schwinn Le Tour Tourist
    Jamis Coda Femme

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Little Egypt
    Posts
    1,867
    I just googled the term "Garmin 500 not calculating calories" and got a page full of the same complaints. Many forums, including Garmin's, have posts that address this issue so it's not just us. What I did read is that Garmin is aware of the issue and they will be coming out with a firmware upgrade to fix it soon. All I can say is just keep upgrading your Garmin when there is a firmware upgrade and see if it fixes the problem. Everything else on the 500 works great and I'm pleased with the computer in every other aspect.
    __________________
    "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing." George Bernard Shaw

    Luna Eclipse/Selle Italia Lady
    Surly Pacer/Terry Butterfly
    Quintana Roo Cd01/Koobi Stratus
    1981 Schwinn Le Tour Tourist
    Jamis Coda Femme

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    144
    I mostly don't use the HR strap with my 500 because it gets irritating sometimes. But I've noticed that the 500 overestimates the calories burned, IMO, on a ride without the use of the strap. I was on the North Branch Trail this past Saturday, finished a 60 mile ride, and burned something like 3300 calories in 3 hours. No real climbing. My avg speed was 18mph. Even at 175, I think that's overestimating.

    I've just learned that it's a loose gauge of calories burned.
    2009 Blue RD-1/White Selle Italia Max Flite Gel

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    1,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocivixen View Post
    To original poster: Why do you want this information? Training purposes? To gauge how much to eat? Just for kicks? Numbers nerd? I'm curious.
    I'd have to say, "all of the above" as my answer. But mainly to gauge how many calories I need to consume in a day and how much activity I need to do. Ideally, I would like to lose a few pounds, but knowing these numbers will help to ensure that I won't GAIN any.

    Linda
    2012 Seven Axiom SL - Specialized Ruby SL 155

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •