Accuracy of calories burned while biking

[bellissima]

Thank you!!! I just updated this info in my settings on Garmin Connect...although I am certain that I entered this info on the actual Edge 500 unit itself. I chose to enter a "9" for activity class, even though I'm actually more like a "10", which is over 15 hours/week. I'm at the gym a minimum of 3 hours, 5 days/week...in addition to my long weekend rides which can typically be anywhere between 3-5 hours. Yes...I exercise a LOT. We'll see what happens on my ride tomorrow, with my HR & calorie burn. I'll post an update.

Linda

Linda, Prediction of functional aerobic capacity without exercise testing is used by Garmin in order to set the values for people that hasn't have a fitness test done or don't know their HR zones, it does not warranty that will set your zones correctly. I believe for you would be a good idea to check what values are set up as your max HR, resting HR and zones as these get set up by the Garmin when selecting you Activity Class at the beginning of the set up. If you know what is your maximum heart rate, resting heart rate and what are your heart rate zones, input those in your Garmin and you'll get a more accurate reading.

[OakLeaf]

bellissima, what do the zones actually mean?

It seems to me, as I said before, that my old old Garmin derived mine reasonably accurately, at least as they correspond to my perceived exertion.

My MHR for running is around 188, resting around 50, but it goes up pretty quickly with any activity. Zone 1 starts at 86 according to the Garmin, which is about where it goes at moderately brisk walking. But then Zone 2 doesn't start until 146, which is about where my respiration rate starts to increase appreciably. I can't run at all, not even a slow jog, with a HR below around 135, and if I can keep it there, I do NOT feel like I'm working.

So from there, zones 2 through 5 are quite narrow - 9 or 10 bpm. That doesn't make a lot of sense, and it's tough when I'm supposed to stay in zone 3, for instance ... but again, it works with my perceived exertion.

What's your take???

[bellissima]

bellissima, what do the zones actually mean?

It seems to me, as I said before, that my old old Garmin derived mine reasonably accurately, at least as they correspond to my perceived exertion.

My MHR for running is around 188, resting around 50, but it goes up pretty quickly with any activity. Zone 1 starts at 86 according to the Garmin, which is about where it goes at moderately brisk walking. But then Zone 2 doesn't start until 146, which is about where my respiration rate starts to increase appreciably. I can't run at all, not even a slow jog, with a HR below around 135, and if I can keep it there, I do NOT feel like I'm working.

So from there, zones 2 through 5 are quite narrow - 9 or 10 bpm. That doesn't make a lot of sense, and it's tough when I'm supposed to stay in zone 3, for instance ... but again, it works with my perceived exertion.

What's your take???

For me zones 1 and 2 are very similar, zone 2 is quite easy and it really doesn’t feel like much work is being done, in the same hand is hard to stay at this zone and it takes some practice as any increase on effort will take me to zone 3, so I would need to pay attention to my computer if I want to stay at zone 2, zone 3 is where I start to feel as I am working and find that if I don’t pay attention I tend to gravitate towards this zone, zone 4 feels hard, it takes concentration to maintain for long periods of time. You zones seem to be somewhat off, If we calculate your zones by just using your MAX HR being 188 and using percentages your zones may look similar to: Zone 1 (Active Recovery) 94-112, Zone 2 (Endurance) 113-131, Zone 3 (Tempo) 132-149, Zone 4 (Threshold) 150-168, Zone 5 169-188. At 146 bpm you would be at the upper part of zone 3. The best way to calculate your zones is by doing a test and calculating your actual threshold.

[DarcyInOregon]

Classic MapMyRide has a pretty good calculator for determining one's heart rate zones if you know your maximum heart rate, or you can accept the calculator's formula for maximum heart rate.

http://classic.mapmyride.com/calculate_mhr

There is a good explanation of each zone as pertaining to cycling.

The calculator's formula for calculating the maximum heart rate actually works for me. At my age and based on knowing my heart rate at maximum exertion, I estimated my maximum heart rate to be between 165 and 170, and the calculator states 169, so right in the range I thought it was.

[OakLeaf]

But it looks like all of those just take your MHR (either tested or approximated from the general population), start at 60% and divide into equal portions... Which I know how the 301 got MHR, but it's possible that's what it does for zones 2 through 5, since what it gave me for those are all equal within a beat.

I'm reasonably confident of my MHR. That's what I'll see toward the end of the fourth or fifth of a series of sprint intervals on a really hot day, about the time I'm seeing stars and ready to throw up... I'm actually more confident of that number than I am of my RHR - I've never bothered to wear a strap while I sleep, so I just took what I'll see when driving to an event, which is in the low 50s as long as traffic isn't crazy, and then just subtracted a couple of beats for the demands of attention and sitting.

But how do you actually test for the zones?

[bellissima]

But it looks like all of those just take your MHR (either tested or approximated from the general population), start at 60% and divide into equal portions... Which I know how the 301 got MHR, but it's possible that's what it does for zones 2 through 5, since what it gave me for those are all equal within a beat.

I'm reasonably confident of my MHR. That's what I'll see toward the end of the fourth or fifth of a series of sprint intervals on a really hot day, about the time I'm seeing stars and ready to throw up... I'm actually more confident of that number than I am of my RHR - I've never bothered to wear a strap while I sleep, so I just took what I'll see when driving to an event, which is in the low 50s as long as traffic isn't crazy, and then just subtracted a couple of beats for the demands of attention and sitting.

But how do you actually test for the zones?

I agree, is most likely that your MHR is correct as that is the number you can see when dying onr those intervals Calculating your zones from your MHR is good. I would use your anaerobic threshold to calculate your zones as it is a more accurate, anaerobic threshold(Lactate threshold) is the point at which lactic acid starts to accumulate in your muscles, this will be your zone 4 and is between 80% and 90% of your maximum heart rate. You can find out your threshold with a simple test. Find a long climb or a hill that will take about 30minutes to complete when riding all out, if a hill is not available it can be done on a flat or against the wind. Warm up for at least 20 minutes and then ride as hard as you can for 30 minutes, at the 10 minute mark press the lap so it will record the last 30 minutes of you hear rate, this will be your Threshold (Lactate threshold) and you can use this test for running also. Once you get this number all the zones are calculated from that number.

[nscrbug]

I just wanted to post an update. So this weekend, I changed the battery in my HR strap (even though I didn't think I needed to), picked up a bottle of HR electrode gel and applied it to the HR strap, and took a manual pulse to see if it was close to what my Garmin was showing right before I set off on my ride. My HR was sitting right around 75-78, just futzing around getting on my gloves and so forth...which was right on target with what my manual pulse reading was. So, I established that the HRM seemed to be working properly at the time. I also double-checked my profile on the Garmin, and made sure that all the data was entered correctly - ht 5'6", wt 157lbs, Female, 44yo, activity class = 9.

After 3 consecutive days of riding, the results of my HR/calorie data were the same as before. On Sat, my avg HR was 101; on Sun, 109; and today, 108. Calorie burn was 888 (65 miles), 1,147 (83 miles), and 551 (43 miles) respectively. I don't know, it just seems weird that I cannot seem to get my HR up at all on the bike. I can safely say that I have NEVER even come anywhere close to hitting my MHR while riding. Is it possible that I just have a freakishly low HR? I normally don't wear a HRM at the gym, but now I am curious to see if it's that low during any kind of activity.

Don't know if this matters or not, but I do remember last year during a routine colonoscopy I was hooked up to a monitor and I kept setting off the alarms on it because my HR kept dipping below 40....freaked out the nurses. Maybe I just naturally have a lower HR? I don't know....

Linda