Brooks b17 edge question

[Kitsune06]

Yeah, that's maybe a bit of a game changer. What bony surface do you sit on, then, if any, on that side?

I suppose the difinitive way to see where your sit bones (or their nearest approximation) are would be to use a piece of tinfoil, crumple it, unfold it and sit on it. Wiggle 'round a little then get up and there should be a couple spots about golfball circumference (or more, or less) where your ischial tuberosities would sit. You'd measure from outside to outside.

I'm sorry you're experiencing discomfort.

[Beane]

On what surface do I do the tinfoil exercise? Something squishy like a yoga mat on top of something firm?

Don't worry, it's not your fault I don't know my sit bones' width.

My DH thinks I'm crazy (even though this is my first saddle purchase in a while) and said that if I ride it regularly for 3 weeks and still think it doesn't fit he'll buy me any saddle I want. Ha ha!

[Kitsune06]

On what surface do I do the tinfoil exercise? Something squishy like a yoga mat on top of something firm?

Don't worry, it's not your fault I don't know my sit bones' width.
!

I used a pretty firm, flat surface. I crumpled the tinfoil so the little bumps and crinkles would flatten out where I was sitting on them and give me a really definite answer. Think maybe a wooden chair or counter top edge? Toilet seat lid?

There's a post by Knot somewhere in the annals of the Brooks thread (I think?) that says you should basically subtract 10mm from either side (or 20mm total) from brooks' official width measurements to get the max sitting space, since the outer 10mm is all rail in the back. The B17 is 170? 177? mm wide, so you have roughly 150-157mm of sitting space on it, if I understand right.

[BleeckerSt_Girl]

My DH thinks I'm crazy (even though this is my first saddle purchase in a while) and said that if I ride it regularly for 3 weeks and still think it doesn't fit he'll buy me any saddle I want. Ha ha!

I think this sounds like a reasonable deal!
Ride it for 3 weeks regularly. By that time your sitbones will be 'broken in' and the initial soreness should be all or almost all gone.
If you still feel like you are riding on the edges, ask him to get you the B68. Then sell the B17 here or on Ebay or Craigslist. Try here on TE first.

This happened to me, ecxept I rode about a year and over 1,000 miles on my B17 before I decided it just wasn't quite wide enough. I sold it here and got a B68 which felt perfect from the minute I sat on it. Have B68's on both my two bikes, they are perfect for me.

[Kitsune06]

well... my concern is that if you don't have a true ischial tuberosity (any xrays or illustrations or detailed descriptions would help) on one side, then perhaps NO brooks saddle would be comfortable? Brooks works on the concept that the ITs provide all the support so soft tissue doesn't really come in contact with the hard saddle itself. (well it does, but it doesn't bear weight, really). The mechanics of this fit might be a bit more complicated.

Which anterior ramus are you missing? the superior or inferior, and is it missing all the way back to the body of the ischium (the most lateral border of the obturator foramen) or just a section by the pubic symphisis? Is there a structural support there like a plate and screws, or cage, or an open section since the closed structure should still be decently sound?

Sorry if this is delving into personal realms, but this might us more info to work with. We're all here for each other.

[Beane]

I measured my sit bones three times and came up with three diff measurements, but 160 would be my guess. So B17 might not work. I will give it more time though.

Below is pic of what I'm missing.. I don't think it's an important bone. At least when they took it out they said it was non weight bearing and didn't even prescribe any physical therapy. I do walk with a tiny limp though (or so my mom says).

p.s. They didn't put anything in to replace it, but a titanium rod would have been sweet!

[Kitsune06]

I measured my sit bones three times and came up with three diff measurements, but 160 would be my guess. So B17 might not work. I will give it more time though.

Below is pic of what I'm missing.. I don't think it's an important bone. At least when they took it out they said it was non weight bearing and didn't even prescribe any physical therapy. I do walk with a tiny limp though (or so my mom says).

p.s. They didn't put anything in to replace it, but a titanium rod would have been sweet!

oh ok, then you do have ischial tuberosities just fine. 160 could be juuuust on the edge of what's going to be comfortable and what's not, but I'd stick with it for a little bit just to be sure.

Lisa's right- once you break in your 'brooks butt', you might be surprised at how comfortable the saddle can be even if you're sitting 'bout on the rails. When that saddle was still practically new, and I was still sitting on the rails (mismeasured my sitbone width) I did a metric century and afterward my sit bones were the least sore parts of me. So perhaps you'll need to wait 'til you're broken in a bit and then see where you're sitting and how comfortable it feels?

[BleeckerSt_Girl]

It's true, after you've ridden on it for a few dozen rides or a month or two, it's much easier to tell if you are sitting on the metal frame edge or not. It's hard to tell when you are sore and when you're not used to the saddle yet.

[Beane]

I think this sounds like a reasonable deal!

If you still feel like you are riding on the edges, ask him to get you the B68.

...As long as he's buying, I wonder if they make the B68 with titanium rails..

Or maybe this, for $231! :