Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by lunacycles View Post
    Trail for 26" wheels (assuming 1.5" tires):

    70 deg Head angle with 45mm rake = 66mm trail
    71.5 deg head angle with 50mm rake = 62mm trail

    I personally would go with the latter. But it's not a big difference.
    Margo, thank you, I had hoped you would see this. The 71.5 deg head angle with 50mm rake is what Waterford is recommending for my Gunnar custom build. It appears to have a trail of 54.7 if my fitter has recorded this properly - is that possible with the given head angle and 50mm rake? I do not know what tire size they are assuming for the Gunnar. The basic design is based on their cross frame, and they are recommending an upgraded Waterford road fork (for weight, and I won't be putting racks on this bike).

    I am looking at some hand-written notes he gave me that compares the custom specs with my LHT - and the wheels are indeed 26'. Both chainstay and wheelbase are quite a bit shorter, if that matters.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355
    My error. I read it wrong on my CAD program (it's an image on top of an image, and my reading glasses are at work with my welding helmet). 71.5 h.a. with 50mm rake is 52mm, not 62mm of trail based on 26 x 1.5 inch tires (your fitter may have used a different tire profile to arrive at the other number..and it's 56mm, not 66mm of trail for the other combo). I like a trail of 60 mm plus or minus a few for this kind of bike, but builders have a lot of opinions around this based on their own biases, insofar as what constitutes "ideal handling." IMO, a higher trail is better if there is no load on the front. A lower trail will be theoretically livelier in terms of front-end handling but also maybe less stable/more "twitchy." Typical road bike trail is 55mm or so. But it also depends on your stem length, body weigh distribution, blah blah blah, as to what's best.
    A fork with more rake will be more plush, theoretically. A head angle of 70 degrees is the very lowest I would go. 71.5 sounds a lot more reasonable for a frame using 26" wheels.
    Ultimately, seriously, this is all within normalcy, so I'd advise that you trust your builder. It's Waterford, after all. They've been doing this a while.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by lunacycles View Post
    ....
    Ultimately, seriously, this is all within normalcy, so I'd advise that you trust your builder. It's Waterford, after all. They've been doing this a while.
    Indeed, that is my perspective as well! I am just trying to better understand the design to help me justify the cost. Waterford does beautiful work and have great people

    My fitter encourages his clients who are getting a Waterford or Gunnar to talk directly with the frame builder so that all three of us (designer, fitter, and customer) are all happy when it is time for me to to literally sign off on the final design.

    Thank you Margo, I appreciate it!
    Last edited by Catrin; 01-16-2011 at 02:29 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355
    Cool. It's great you want to be in the know about all of it, even this minutiae which can make customers (and builders) a bit nutty... It's also cool you are going this route. I think it makes sense, it's great you're asking questions, and I hope you love your custom Gunnar!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    I just had a nice talk with my frame designer, and during the course of our discussion she decided to relax the fork a bit to make it a little more stable - and she is also going to allow for a little more toe overlap. It was a good discussion and I have a much better understanding on why their stock sizes just won't work for me as far as fit is concerned. I knew, generally, that their stock size wouldn't fit me, but now I've a better understanding why. Of course the difference in weight alone will make a big difference in handling!

    It's all good, and thanks to Margo and everyone for their patience while I work this out. It is an exciting, if expensive, process. I also know that I could be paying a lot more and a properly designed steel bike will last me far longer than I will remember the price tag

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    6,034
    Those sound like good adjustments to make to the design. It's great that they're taking the time to explain all of it to you.
    Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.

    --Mary Anne Radmacher

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Basically I wanted the sales pitch - how is this better than the stock size & I want to make certain that she is almost as stable as my LHT. I learned quite a lot and she listened to me as well.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •