Margo, thank you, I had hoped you would see this. The 71.5 deg head angle with 50mm rake is what Waterford is recommending for my Gunnar custom build. It appears to have a trail of 54.7 if my fitter has recorded this properly - is that possible with the given head angle and 50mm rake? I do not know what tire size they are assuming for the Gunnar. The basic design is based on their cross frame, and they are recommending an upgraded Waterford road fork (for weight, and I won't be putting racks on this bike).
I am looking at some hand-written notes he gave me that compares the custom specs with my LHT - and the wheels are indeed 26'. Both chainstay and wheelbase are quite a bit shorter, if that matters.




Reply With Quote
). 71.5 h.a. with 50mm rake is 52mm, not 62mm of trail based on 26 x 1.5 inch tires (your fitter may have used a different tire profile to arrive at the other number..and it's 56mm, not 66mm of trail for the other combo). I like a trail of 60 mm plus or minus a few for this kind of bike, but builders have a lot of opinions around this based on their own biases, insofar as what constitutes "ideal handling." IMO, a higher trail is better if there is no load on the front. A lower trail will be theoretically livelier in terms of front-end handling but also maybe less stable/more "twitchy." Typical road bike trail is 55mm or so. But it also depends on your stem length, body weigh distribution, blah blah blah, as to what's best.
