Is this written with the assumption that fat-burning is better? If yes, does that mean better for performance, or just so you don't gain weight?
I'm not arguing, btw, just trying to understand.
To disable ads, please log-in.
I really like the advice on his website. Makes sense. And falls into what a lot of what you all do during your long training rides.
http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2010/05...nutrition.html
Lisa
Bacchetta Ti Aero
ICE B1
Bacchetta Cafe Mountain Bent
Is this written with the assumption that fat-burning is better? If yes, does that mean better for performance, or just so you don't gain weight?
I'm not arguing, btw, just trying to understand.
Using fat for fuel is generally a more stable source, steady fuel for aerobic metabolism. Dumping glycogen/glucose (depleting the stores in the liver) is more like a sudden burst source for anaerobic metabolism.
I can go for a long steady ride burning fat as the strategy for most efficient steady power production, but I can dump glucose from the liver for a sudden (and somewhat inefficient in the long run) burst of power to sprint away from a charging bull that escaped onto the roadway.
The body can completely switch to ketone metabolism for fuel during famine, as well. It's very funky, the variety of ways the body has to keep the ol' metabolic fires burning!
Fat is a great fuel, not just a social and medical problem.
"If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson
That's a great article. It validates what I've thought was true for a while, since I've stopped eating sugar: that we really don't need that sugar, not even when we're working out. I mean, cavemen didn't have refined sugar and I'm sure their entire life was a workout.Thanks for sharing!
2009 Trek 7.2FX WSD, brooks Champion Flyer S, commuter bike
Each day is a gift, that's why it is called the present.